Empowerment of Lay Mental Health Workers and Junior Psychologists Online in a Task-Shared, Rural Setting in Kerala, India

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Psychology, Mental Health Action Trust, Calicut, India

2 Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3 Mental Health Action Trust, Calicut, India

Abstract

Background 
Patients with severe mental health issues who live in isolated rural areas are difficult to reach and treat. Providing effective treatment is difficult because mental health problems are complex and require specialized knowledge from a range of professionals. Task-sharing with lay mental health workers (LMHWs) has potential but requires proper training and supervision to be effective. This article reports on the challenges and facilitators experienced in empowering LMHWs in their role, with the help of a technology supported supervision group. The study sought to understand the functioning of the Empowering Supervisory Group (ESG) in the context of junior psychologists and LMHWs in rural India, and investigate how they experienced it by exploring challenges, lessons and empowerment.
 
Methods 
Qualitative analysis of interviews with the 22 ESG participants and their supervisors.
 
Results 
A total of three discrete phases of supervision were identified where supervisors responded to the changing needs of the group. This began with building trust at a baseline level, tackling issues with competence and autonomy and finally experiencing meaning and impact through self-determination. The experience of empowerment even in an online setting was very beneficial given the challenges of working in rural areas.
 
Conclusion 
Empowerment based supervision of LMHWs and junior psychologists online enables a level of engagement that positions them to engage in community mental health practices with greater independence and confidence. 

Keywords

References

  1. Freeman M. The World Mental Health Report: transforming mental health for all. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(3):391-392. doi:1002/wps.21018
  2. Raghavan V, Rangaswamy T. Challenges and opportunities in delivering mental health care in low- and middle-income countries. In: Innovations in Global Mental Health. Springer; 2021:519-533. doi:1007/978-3-030-57296-9_13
  3. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Mental Disorders Collaborators. The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2017. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(2):148-161. doi:1016/s2215-0366(19)30475-4
  4. Gautham MS, Gururaj G, Varghese M, et al. The National Mental Health Survey of India (2016): prevalence, socio-demographic correlates and treatment gap of mental morbidity. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(4):361-372. doi:1177/0020764020907941
  5. Thornicroft G, Sunkel C, Alikhon Aliev A, et al. The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health. Lancet. 2022;400(10361):1438-1480. doi:1016/s0140-6736(22)01470-2
  6. Orsucci F, Tschacher W. Complexity science in human change: research, models, clinical applications. Entropy (Basel). 2022;24(11):1670. doi:3390/e24111670
  7. Schiepek G, Pincus D. Complexity science: a framework for psychotherapy integration. Couns Psychother Res. 2023. doi:1002/capr.12641
  8. Lehmann U, Twum-Danso NAY, Nyoni J. Towards universal health coverage: what are the system requirements for effective large-scale community health worker programmes? BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(Suppl 9):e001046. doi:1136/bmjgh-2018-001046
  9. Patel V, Weiss HA, Chowdhary N, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention led by lay health counsellors for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care in Goa, India (MANAS): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9758):2086-2095. doi:1016/s0140-6736(10)61508-5
  10. Joag K, Shields-Zeeman L, Kapadia-Kundu N, Kawade R, Balaji M, Pathare S. Feasibility and acceptability of a novel community-based mental health intervention delivered by community volunteers in Maharashtra, India: the Atmiyata programme. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):48. doi:1186/s12888-020-2466-z
  11. Muke SS, Shrivastava RD, Mitchell L, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of digital technology for training community health workers to deliver brief psychological treatment for depression in rural India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019;45:99-106. doi:1016/j.ajp.2019.09.006
  12. Kemp CG, Petersen I, Bhana A, Rao D. Supervision of task-shared mental health care in low-resource settings: a commentary on programmatic experience. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(2):150-159. doi:9745/ghsp-d-18-00337
  13. Singh OP. Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2030: we must rise to the challenge. Indian J Psychiatry. 2021;63(5):415-417. doi:4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_811_21
  14. Hailes HP, Ceccolini CJ, Gutowski E, Liang B. Ethical guidelines for social justice in psychology. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2021;52(1):1-11. doi:1037/pro0000291
  15. Martin P, Lizarondo L, Kumar S. A systematic review of the factors that influence the quality and effectiveness of telesupervision for health professionals. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(4):271-281. doi:1177/1357633x17698868
  16. Jackson CB, Quetsch LB, Brabson LA, Herschell AD. Web-based training methods for behavioral health providers: a systematic review. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018;45(4):587-610. doi:1007/s10488-018-0847-0
  17. Kumar TM. (2018). Community psychiatry–Transcontinental lessons of the last quarter century. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2018;34(4):292-295. doi:4103/ijsp.ijsp_75_18
  18. Augusterfer EF, O'Neal CR, Martin SW, Sheikh TL, Mollica RF. The role of telemental health, tele-consultation, and tele-supervision in post-disaster and low-resource settings. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020;22(12):85. doi:1007/s11920-020-01209-5
  19. Keet R, de Vetten-Mc Mahon M, Shields-Zeeman L, et al. Recovery for all in the community; position paper on principles and key elements of community-based mental health care. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):174. doi:1186/s12888-019-2162-z
  20. De Brún A, O'Donovan R, McAuliffe E. Interventions to develop collectivistic leadership in healthcare settings: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):72. doi:1186/s12913-019-3883-x
  21. Mannion R, Exworthy M, Wiig S, Braithwaite J. The power of autonomy and resilience in healthcare delivery. BMJ. 2023;382:e073331. doi:1136/bmj-2022-073331
  22. Balagopal G, Kapanee AR. Lessons learnt from NGO approaches to mental healthcare provision in the community. In: Mental Health Care Services in Community Settings: Discussions on NGO Approaches in India. Singapore: Springer; 2019:185-204. doi:1007/978-981-13-9101-9_7
  23. Kumar TM. Community mental health services in India: the pandemic and beyond. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;36(Suppl 1):S168-S173. doi:4103/ijsp.ijsp_126_20
  24. Yazdanshenas M, Mirzaei M. Leadership integrity and employees’ success: role of ethical leadership, psychological capital, and psychological empowerment. Int J Ethics Syst. 2022. doi:1108/ijoes-05-2022-0117
  25. Juyumaya J. How psychological empowerment impacts task performance: the mediation role of work engagement and moderating role of age. Front Psychol. 2022;13:889936. doi:3389/fpsyg.2022.889936
  26. Adeel A, Batool S, Ali R. Social networks, psychological empowerment, and work outcomes: mediating role of psychological empowerment dimensions on the relations between social networks, job dedication, and individual creativity. Int J Bus Environ. 2019;10(4):346-370. doi:1504/ijbe.2019.101641
  27. Bin Saeed B, Afsar B, Shahjeha A, Imad Shah S. Does transformational leadership foster innovative work behavior? The roles of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Econ Res Ekon Istraz. 2019;32(1):254-281. doi:1080/1331677x.2018.1556108
  28. Bunders AE, Broerse JEW, Regeer BJ. Leadership for empowerment: analyzing leadership practices in a youth care organization using peer video reflection. Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2021;45(5):431-453. doi:1080/23303131.2021.1961333
  29. Allan BA, Batz-Barbarich C, Sterling HM, Tay L. Outcomes of meaningful work: a meta‐analysis. J Manag Stud. 2019;56(3):500-528. doi:1111/joms.12406
  30. Croswaite Brindle K, Murphy C. The Empowerment Model of Clinical Supervision: A Roadmap Through the Complexities of Community Mental Health. Supervisionary LLC; 2019
  31. Cowan KE, McKean AJ, Gentry MT, Hilty DM. Barriers to use of telepsychiatry: clinicians as gatekeepers. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(12):2510-2523. doi:1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018
  32. World Health Organization (WHO). Consolidated Telemedicine Implementation Guide. WHO; 2022.
  33. Naslund JA, Mitchell LM, Joshi U, Nagda D, Lu C. Economic evaluation and costs of telepsychiatry programmes: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(5):311-330. doi:1177/1357633x20938919
  34. Mascolo MF, Kallio E. The phenomenology of between: an intersubjective epistemology for psychological science. J Constr Psychol. 2020;33(1):1-28. doi:1080/10720537.2019.1635924
  35. Kok MC, Vallières F, Tulloch O, et al. Does supportive supervision enhance community health worker motivation? A mixed-methods study in four African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(9):988-998. doi:1093/heapol/czy082
  36. Wasunna B, Holeman I. Digital health interventions for community health worker training, ongoing education, and supportive supervision. In: Geniets A, O'Donovan J, Winters N, Hakimi L, eds. Training for Community Health: Bridging the Global Health Care Gap. Oxford University Press; 2021:67-86. doi:1093/oso/9780198866244.003.0005
  37. O’Donovan J. Approaches to community health worker training and supervision. In: Geniets A, O'Donovan J, Winters N, Hakimi L, eds. Training for Community Health: Bridging the Global Health Care Gap. Oxford University Press; 2021:51-66. doi:1093/oso/9780198866244.003.0004
  38. Kemp C, Chwastiak L, Petersen I, Bhana A, Wagenaar BH, Unützer J, et al. Implementation of integrated care models: lessons for training and practice in low-resource settings. In: Acharya B, Becker AE, eds. Global Mental Health Training and Practice. Routledge; 2023:120-134. doi:4324/9781315160597-9
  39. Hyams R, Brown G, Foster R. The benefits of multidisciplinary learning in clinical practice for law, finance, and social work students: an Australian experience. J Teach Soc Work. 2013;33(2):159-176. doi:1080/08841233.2013.772555
  40. Bradley WJ, Becker KD. Clinical supervision of mental health services: a systematic review of supervision characteristics and practices associated with formative and restorative outcomes. Clin Superv. 2021;40(1):88-111. doi:1080/07325223.2021.1904312
  41. Watkins CE Jr. What do clinical supervision research reviews tell us? Surveying the last 25 years. Couns Psychother Res. 2020;20(2):190-208. doi:1002/capr.12287
  42. Schriger SH, Becker-Haimes EM, Skriner L, Beidas RS. Clinical supervision in community mental health: characterizing supervision as usual and exploring predictors of supervision content and process. Community Ment Health J. 2021;57(3):552-566. doi:1007/s10597-020-00681-w
  43. Rothwell C, Kehoe A, Farook SF, Illing J. Enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision in the workplace: a rapid evidence review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e052929. doi:1136/bmjopen-2021-052929
  44. Driscoll J, Stacey G, Harrison-Dening K, Boyd C, Shaw T. Enhancing the quality of clinical supervision in nursing practice. Nurs Stand. 2019;34(5):43-50. doi:7748/ns.2019.e11228
  45. Corey G, Haynes RH, Moulton P, Muratori M. Clinical Supervision in the Helping Professions: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
  46. Downing KM. Creating the Container for Reflective Practice in Virtual Small Group Supervision [dissertation]. Middlesex University; 2021.
  47. Milne DL, Reiser RP. Resolving Critical Issues in Clinical Supervision: A Practical, Evidence-Based Approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
  48. Kühne F, Maas J, Wiesenthal S, Weck F. Empirical research in clinical supervision: a systematic review and suggestions for future studies. BMC Psychol. 2019;7(1):54. doi:1186/s40359-019-0327-7
  49. Martin P, Lizarondo L, Kumar S. A systematic review of the factors that influence the quality and effectiveness of telesupervision for health professionals. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(4):271-281. doi:1177/1357633x17698868
  50. Stokes A. Online Supervision: A Handbook for Practitioners. Taylor & Francis; 2023.
  51. Bernhard PA, Camins JS. Supervision from Afar: trainees’ perspectives on telesupervision. Couns Psychol Q. 2021;34(3-4):377-386. doi:1080/09515070.2020.1770697
  52. Merlo EM, Stoian AP, Motofei IG, Settineri S. Clinical psychological figures in healthcare professionals: resilience and maladjustment as the "cost of care". Front Psychol. 2020;11:607783. doi:3389/fpsyg.2020.607783
  53. Simmons M, Brown J, Willems J. Remote general practice supervision with video cameras: insights for the global COVID-19 pandemic. Aust J Gen Pract. 2022;51(9):696-702. doi:31128/ajgp-11-21-6240
  54. Soheilian SS, O'Shaughnessy T, Lehmann JS, Rivero M. Examining the impact of COVID-19 on supervisees’ experiences of clinical supervision. Train Educ Prof Psychol. 2023;17(2):167-175. doi:1037/tep0000418
  55. Snowdon DA, Sargent M, Williams CM, Maloney S, Caspers K, Taylor NF. Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;20(1):2. doi:1186/s12913-019-4873-8
  56. Saab MM, Kilty C, Meehan E, et al. Peer group clinical supervision: qualitative perspectives from nurse supervisees, managers, and supervisors. Collegian. 2021;28(4):359-368. doi:1016/j.colegn.2020.11.004
  57. Kane S, Kok M, Ormel H, et al. Limits and opportunities to community health worker empowerment: a multi-country comparative study. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:27-34. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.019
  58. Pandey D, Ogunmola GA, Enbeyle W, Abdullahi M, Pandey BK, Pramanik S. COVID-19: a framework for effective delivering of online classes during lockdown. Hu Arenas. 2022;5(2):322-336. doi:1007/s42087-020-00175-x
  59. Pondalos EC, Saputri NE, Pratiwi TL. Promoting autonomous learning through online discussion. J Eng Acad Specif Purp. 2022;5(1):303-310. doi:18860/jeasp.v5i1.16582
  60. Abdull Mutalib AA, Md Akim A, Jaafar MH. A systematic review of health sciences students' online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):524. doi:1186/s12909-022-03579-1
  61. Levitt HM. Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qual Psychol. 2021;8(1):95-110. doi:1037/qup0000184
  62. Maxwell JA, Chmiel M. Generalization in and from qualitative analysis. In: Flick U, ed. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014:540-553. doi:4135/9781446282243.n37
  63. Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148. doi:1186/s12874-018-0594-7
  64. Bergen N, Labonté R. "Everything is perfect, and we have no problems": detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783-792. doi:1177/1049732319889354
  65. D'Arcy C, Taket A, Hanna L. Implementing empowerment-based Lay Health Worker programs: a preliminary study. Health Promot Int. 2019;34(4):726-734. doi:1093/heapro/day023
  66. Kozlowski SW.Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organ Psychol Rev. 2015;5(4):270-299
  67. Bergen N, Labonté R. “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783-792.
  68. Pallikkuth R, Manoj Kumar T, Dictus CT, Bunders-Aelen JFG. (2024). Design and Evaluation of Peer Supervision for Community Mental Health Workers: A Task-Shifting Strategy in Low-Resource Settings. Community Ment Health J. 2024;60(1):131-147. doi:1007/s10597-023-01161-7
International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 02 April 2024

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 13 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 30 March 2024
  • First Publish Date: 02 April 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics