What Policies Do Local Governments Use to Promote Physical Activity? A Comparative Analysis of Municipalities From 4 EU Countries and Japan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

2 Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

3 Université Côte d’Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France

4 Center for Promotion of Higher Education, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan

5 Adults on the Move Program, Jamk University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland

6 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

7 Sports Medicine Research Center, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan

8 Faculty of Sport Management, Nippon Sport Science University, Yokohama, Japan

9 Independent Researcher, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

10 Institute of Sport Sciences, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Background 
As public policies have the potential to change the entire system of physical activity (PA) promotion and to create conducive environments, they are particularly relevant to address the persistently low levels of PA across the world. Furthermore, World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Global Action Plan on Physical Activity highlights the relevance of local governments as important partners for policy action. However, our knowledge on how local PA promotion policy compares across countries remains limited.
 
Methods 
We conducted an exploratory study as part of the LoGoPAS project to compare the status quo of local PA policies across five municipalities in five different countries. Using purposive sampling, Jyväskylä (Finland), Nice (France), Erlangen (Germany), Fujisawa (Japan), and Cluj-Napoca (Romania) were selected. Data were collected and analysed via desk research and expert consultation using the CAPLA-Santé, a validated tool designed to assess relevant aspects of local PA promotion policies.
 
Results 
The analysis showed that the main responsibility for PA promotion varied between municipalities, resting either with the sport or the health sector. A total of 50 relevant PA policy documents were identified, focusing on multiple settings and target groups. Budgets for PA promotion differed across municipalities. Research on PA was reported to have informed policy development in some but not all cases. Across countries, political support was identified as a key driver of local PA promotion.
 
Conclusion  
LoGoPAS is the first study to apply the CAPLA-Santé outside of France and the first to use it for an international comparative analysis. Results highlight the ability of the tool to provide insights into local PA policy development, contents, and implementation worldwide. While this study provided a cross-sectional in-depth analysis of the status quo in select municipalities, future research could also aim to assess policies at a large scale, ie, for multiple municipalities and/or on a regular basis. 

Keywords


  1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(1):23-35. doi:1016/s2352-4642(19)30323-2
  2. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077-e1086. doi:1016/s2214-109x(18)30357-7
  3. Tison GH, Barrios J, Avram R, et al. Worldwide physical activity trends since COVID-19 onset. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(10):e1381-e1382. doi:1016/s2214-109x(22)00361-8
  4. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-229. doi:1016/s0140-6736(12)61031-9
  5. Woods CB, Kelly L, Volf K, et al. The Physical Activity Environment Policy Index for monitoring government policies and actions to improve physical activity. Eur J Public Health. 2022;32(Suppl 4):iv50-iv58. doi:1093/eurpub/ckac062
  6. Ding D, Ramirez Varela A, Bauman AE, et al. Towards better evidence-informed global action: lessons learnt from the Lancet series and recent developments in physical activity and public health. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(8):462-468. doi:1136/bjsports-2019-101001
  7. den Braver NR, Garcia Bengoechea E, Messing S, et al. The impact of mass-media campaigns on physical activity: a review of reviews through a policy lens. Eur J Public Health. 2022;32(Suppl 4):iv71-iv83. doi:1093/eurpub/ckac085
  8. Woods CB, Volf K, Kelly L, et al. The evidence for the impact of policy on physical activity outcomes within the school setting: a systematic review. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(3):263-276. doi:1016/j.jshs.2021.01.006
  9. Zukowska J, Gobis A, Krajewski P, et al. Which transport policies increase physical activity of the whole of society? A systematic review. J Transp Health. 2022;27:101488. doi:1016/j.jth.2022.101488
  10. Volf K, Kelly L, García Bengoechea E, et al. Evidence of the impact of sport policies on physical activity and sport participation: a systematic mixed studies review. Int J Sport Policy Politics. 2022;14(4):697-712. doi:1080/19406940.2022.2127835
  11. Gelius P, Messing S, Goodwin L, Schow D, Abu-Omar K. What are effective policies for promoting physical activity? A systematic review of reviews. Prev Med Rep. 2020;18:101095. doi:1016/j.pmedr.2020.101095
  12. Bellew B, Schöeppe S, Bull FC, Bauman A. The rise and fall of Australian physical activity policy 1996 - 2006: a national review framed in an international context. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008;5:18. doi:1186/1743-8462-5-18
  13. Bull FC, Bellew B, Schöppe S, Bauman AE. Developments in National Physical Activity Policy: an international review and recommendations towards better practice. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1 Suppl):93-104. doi:1016/s1440-2440(04)80283-4
  14. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15(4):379-397. doi:1016/s0749-3797(98)00076-2
  15. Schmid TL, Pratt M, Witmer L. A framework for physical activity policy research. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(s1):S20-S29. doi:1123/jpah.3.s1.s20
  16. Edwards P, Tsouros AD. Promoting Physical Activity and Active Living in Urban Environments: The Role of Local Governments. WHO Regional Office Europe; 2006.
  17. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for a Healthier World. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  18. Pratt M, Ramirez Varela A, Kohl HW, Klepac Pogrmilovic B, Pedišić Ž, Sallis JF. Plan globally and act locally for physical activity? J Phys Act Health. 2021;18(10):1157-1158. doi:1123/jpah.2021-0471
  19. Eight Investments that Work for Physical Activity. 2020. https://www.ispah.org/resources/key-resources/8-investments.
  20. Milton K, Cavill N, Chalkley A, et al. Eight investments that work for physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2021;18(6):625-630. doi:1123/jpah.2021-0112
  21. Noël Racine A, Van Hoye A, Boyd A, et al. A scoping review of published research on local government policies promoting health-enhancing physical activity. Int J Sport Policy Politics. 2020;12(4):747-763. doi:1080/19406940.2020.1816561
  22. Pratt M, Salvo D, Cavill N, et al. An international perspective on the nexus of physical activity research and policy. Environ Behav. 2015;48(1):37-54. doi:1177/0013916515609668
  23. Resendiz E, Ramírez-Varela A, Mejía-Grueso J, et al. Breaking barriers: an innovative tool to assess the national and city-level physical activity policy development to practice disconnect. J Phys Act Health. 2024;21(5):425-433. doi:1123/jpah.2023-0471
  24. Mejía Grueso J, Pratt M, Resendiz E, et al. Physical activity policies at national and subnational levels: a study in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico. J Phys Act Health. 2024;21(5):445-457. doi:1123/jpah.2023-0342
  25. Klepac Pogrmilovic B, Ramirez Varela A, Pratt M, et al. National physical activity and sedentary behaviour policies in 76 countries: availability, comprehensiveness, implementation, and effectiveness. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):116. doi:1186/s12966-020-01022-6
  26. Messing S, Tcymbal A, Abu-Omar K, Gelius P. Research- vs. government-driven physical activity policy monitoring: a systematic review across different levels of government. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023;21(1):124. doi:1186/s12961-023-01068-5
  27. World Health Organization. 2021 Physical Activity Factsheets for the European Union Member States in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2021.
  28. Bull FC, Milton K, Kahlmeier S. Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) Policy Audit Tool (PAT): Version 2. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2015.
  29. Ramírez Varela A, Hallal PC, Mejía Grueso J, et al. Status and trends of physical activity surveillance, policy, and research in 164 countries: findings from the Global Observatory for Physical Activity-GoPA! 2015 and 2020 surveys. J Phys Act Health. 2023;20(2):112-128. doi:1123/jpah.2022-0464
  30. Librett JJ, Yore MM, Schmid TL. Local ordinances that promote physical activity: a survey of municipal policies. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1399-1403. doi:2105/ajph.93.9.1399
  31. Lillehoj CJ, Daniel-Ulloa JD, Nothwehr F. Prevalence of physical activity policies and environmental strategies in communities and worksites: the Iowa Community Transformation Grant. J Occup Environ Med. 2016;58(1):e1-e5. doi:1097/jom.0000000000000601
  32. Société Française de Santé Publique. CAPLA-Santé Tool (Framework Analysis of Local Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policies). 2019. https://www.sfsp.fr/images/docs/02CAPLA-Sante-Tool.pdf.
  33. Noël Racine A, Garbarino JM, Massiera B, Vuillemin A. Analysis of the local health-enhancing physical activity policies on the French Riviera. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):156. doi:3390/ijerph18010156
  34. European Commission. Assess, Promote and Support the Involvement of Local Governments in Physical Activity and Sport Promotion, Project Reference: 613568-EPP-1-2019-1-RO-SPO-SSCP. 2023. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/projects/search/details/613568-EPP-1-2019-1-RO-SPO-SSCP.
  35. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Insights. 2024. https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks. Accessed August 2, 2024.
  36. Economist Intelligence. Democracy Index 2023. Age of Conflict. 2024. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/. Accessed August 2, 2024.
  37. Noël Racine A, Van Hoye A, Baron A, et al. Development of a local health-enhancing physical activity policy analysis tool in France: CAPLA-Santé. Health Promot Pract. 2021;22(4):540-548. doi:1177/1524839920916462
  38. Gelius P, Messing S, Forberger S, et al. The added value of using the HEPA PAT for physical activity policy monitoring: a four-country comparison. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):22. doi:1186/s12961-021-00681-6
  39. Bull FC, Milton K, Kahlmeier S, et al. Turning the tide: national policy approaches to increasing physical activity in seven European countries. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(11):749-756. doi:1136/bjsports-2013-093200
  40. Van Hoye A, Vandoorne C, Absil G, et al. Health enhancing physical activity in all policies? Comparison of national public actors between France and Belgium. Health Policy. 2019;123(3):327-332. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2019.01.008
  41. Rütten A, Pfeifer K. National Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion. Erlangen: FAU University Press; 2016.
  42. UKK Institute. Physical Activity Recommendations in Finland. 2023. https://ukkinstituutti.fi/en/products-services/physical-activity-recommendations/. Accessed July 10, 2023.
  43. Miyachi M, Tripette J, Kawakami R, Murakami H. "+10 min of physical activity per day": Japan is looking for efficient but feasible recommendations for its population. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2015;61 Suppl:S7-9. doi:3177/jnsv.61.S7
  44. Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation dleedt. Actualisation des repères du PNNS - Révisions des repères relatifs l’activité physique et la sédentarité [Revisions of benchmarks relating to physical activity and sedentary lifestyle]. Maisons-Alfort: 2016.
  45. Emil Boc. Cluj-Napoca European City of Sport 2018. 2019. https://youtu.be/-OCOstWC4i0. Accessed September 7, 2023.
  46. Visit Jyväskylä Region. Jyväskylä - Capital of Sport in Finland. 2018. https://youtu.be/JrxlchaKw4M. Accessed September 7, 2023.
  47. Jyväskylä. Why is Jyväskylä The Capital of Sport? 2023. https://www.jyvaskyla.fi/en/capital-of-sport/why.
  48. Jyväskylä. Outdoors and Recreation. 2023. https://www.jyvaskyla.fi/en/culture-and-leisure/sports-and-recreation/outdoors-and-recreation.
  49. Ville de Nice. Les séances “Seniors en Forme.” 2023. https://www.nice.fr/fr/sports/seniors-en-forme.
  50. Ville de Nice. Nice Acti'Santé. 2023. https://www.nice.fr/fr/sante-et-autonomie/nice-acti-sante.
  51. FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg. BIG - Movement as Investment in Health. Project to promote physical activity among women in difficult life situations. 2023.
  52. Herbert-Maul A, Abu-Omar K, Streber A, et al. Scaling up a community-based exercise program for women in difficult life situations in Germany-the BIG Project as a case-study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(18):9432. doi:3390/ijerph18189432
  53. FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg. GESTALT – GEhen, Spielen und Tanzen Als Lebenslange Tätigkeiten. in Projekt zur Demenzprävention durch Bewegung für Frauen und Männer ab 60 Jahren. 2023.
  54. Till M, Abu-Omar K, Herbert-Maul A, Fleuren T, Reimers AK, Ziemainz H. Scaling up physical activity promotion projects on the community level for women in difficult life situations and older people: BIG-5 and GET-10-a study protocol. Front Public Health. 2022;10:837982. doi:3389/fpubh.2022.837982
  55. Saito Y, Tanaka A, Tajima T, et al. A community-wide intervention to promote physical activity: a five-year quasi-experimental study. Prev Med. 2021;150:106708. doi:1016/j.ypmed.2021.106708
  56. Fujisawa City. Fujisawa Plus 10 (+10) Project. 2023. https://sportssdgs.keio.ac.jp/plusten.
  57. Fujisawa City. Fujisawa Dream Challenge – Fujisawa Walking Project. 2023. https://www.city.fujisawa.kanagawa.jp/kenko-z/kenko/aruku-project.html.
  58. Cluj-Napoca. Cluj Bike. 2023. https://clujbike.eu.
  59. Hämäläinen RM, Aro AR, Lau CJ, Rus D, Cori L, Syed AM. Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements? Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):33. doi:1186/s12961-016-0103-6
  60. Howie EK, Stevick ED. The "ins" and "outs" of physical activity policy implementation: inadequate capacity, inappropriate outcome measures, and insufficient funds. J Sch Health. 2014;84(9):581-585. doi:1111/josh.12182
  61. Noël Racine A, Garbarino JM, Corrion K, D'Arripe-Longueville F, Massiera B, Vuillemin A. Perceptions of barriers and levers of health-enhancing physical activity policies in mid-size French municipalities. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):62. doi:1186/s12961-020-00575-z
  62. Hämäläinen RM, Aro AR, van de Goor I, et al. Exploring the use of research evidence in health-enhancing physical activity policies. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:43. doi:1186/s12961-015-0047-2
  63. Matsudo SM, Matsudo VK, Andrade DR, Araújo TL, Pratt M. Evaluation of a physical activity promotion program: the example of Agita São Paulo. Eval Program Plann. 2006;29(3):301-311. doi:1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.12.006
  64. Jansen MW, De Leeuw E, Hoeijmakers M, De Vries NK. Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. Dynamics of knowledge sharing in The Netherlands. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:33. doi:1186/1478-4505-10-33
  65. Takeda N, Oida Y, Inoue S, Miyachi M, Bull FC. Assessing the development and implementation of physical activity action plans at the prefectural level in Japan: a quantitative study. Research in Exercise Epidemiology. 2019;21(2):113-135. doi:24804/ree.21.113
  66. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. TEAviisari. https://teaviisari.fi/teaviisari/en/index. 2024. Accessed February 20, 2024.
  67. Oida Y, Takeda N, Inoue S, Miyachi M. [Questionnaire survey of municipalities on policies to promote physical activity among residents: an examination by administrative sector and population size]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2024;71(3):153-166. doi:11236/jph.23-040

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 04 January 2025
  • Receive Date: 17 May 2024
  • Revise Date: 19 September 2024
  • Accept Date: 01 January 2025
  • First Publish Date: 04 January 2025