Energy Is Power; Comment on “Energy as a Social and Commercial Determinant of Health: A Qualitative Study of Australian Policy”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Canada Excellence in Research Chair, One Urban Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

Abstract

Baum et al analyse the Australian energy sector’s influence on health. This commentary suggests that their valuable work may be further enhanced by shifting the gaze in five ways: first, by leaving the health field’s dictate of linear analysis into circularity; second, by removing humans from the centre of analysis; third, by regarding the planet as an indivisible whole system and recognising, for instance, that Australia is not Africa; fourth, by recognising that energy is a source of – sometimes perverse, as demonstrated in the Russia-Ukraine conflict – political power; and fifth, by really starting from the energy point of view rather than the human health perspective. To reorient the debate, the commentary ends with a proposal of the energy cycle as a heuristic to explain global and local health equity.

Keywords

References

  1. Baum F, McGreevy MP, MacDougall CM, Henley M. Energy as a social and commercial determinant of health: a qualitative study of Australian policy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7193. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.7193
  2. Green LW, Kreuter Director of Health MW. CDC's planned approach to community health as an application of PRECEED and an inspiration for PROCEED. J Health Educ. 1992;23(3):140-147. doi:1080/10556699.1992.10616277
  3. Solar O, Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44489.
  4. Williams C, Smith JA, Valentine N, et al. The well-being economy and health in all policies: fostering action for change. Health Promot J Austr. 2023;34(3):623-625. doi:1002/hpja.768
  5. Raworth K. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing; 2017.
  6. Benedetto G, Mazza A, Pons E, Bompard E, De Paola A, Thomas D, et al. Supporting a “glocal” energy transition: from local energy communities to global simulation networks. In: 2023 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST). Mugla, Turkiye: IEEE; 2023:1-6. doi:1109/sest57387.2023.10257451
  7. de Leeuw E, Kickbusch I, Rüegg SR. A health promotion perspective on One Health. Can J Public Health. 2024;115(2):271-275. doi:17269/s41997-024-00872-y
  8. Schneider ED, Kay JJ. Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics. Math Comput Model. 1994;19(6-8):25-48. doi:1016/0895-7177(94)90188-0
  9. Armstrong M. Africa Leads the World in Renewable Energy Consumption. Statista; 2022. https://www.statista.com/chart/28673/renewable-energy-as-share-of-electricity-consumption/.
  10. Ritchie H, Roser M. Water Use and Stress. Our World in Data. 2018. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/water-use-stress.
  11. Algunaibet IM, Pozo C, Galán-Martín Á, Huijbregts MA, Mac Dowell N, Guillén-Gosálbez G. Powering sustainable development within planetary boundaries. Energy Environ Sci. 2019;12(6):1890-1900. doi:1039/c8ee03423k
  12. Anaf J, Freeman T, Baum F. Privatisation of government services in Australia: what is known about health and equity impacts. Global Health. 2024;20(1):32. doi:1186/s12992-024-01036-w
  13. Gorman-Murray A, Prior J, Cadorin R, Vincent A, Olivier JL, de Leeuw E. Urban policy, space and wellbeing: a move towards LGBTQIA+ inclusive planning. Public Health Res Pract. 2023;33(4):3342330. doi:17061/phrp3342330
  14. Mišík M, Nosko A. Post-pandemic lessons for EU energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: introduction to a special issue on EU green recovery in the post-COVID-19 period. Energy Policy. 2023;177:113546. doi:1016/j.enpol.2023.113546
  15. Hagenaars LL, Maani N, Schmidt LA. Is the commercial determinants conversation confined to the health sciences? Potentially, and that's a problem. Global Health. 2024;20(1):3. doi:1186/s12992-023-00989-8
  16. van Alten DC, Phielix C, Janssen J, Kester L. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2019;28:100281. doi:1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
  17. Bianchi M, Cordella M. Does circular economy mitigate the extraction of natural resources? Empirical evidence based on analysis of 28 European economies over the past decade. Ecol Econ. 2023;203:107607. doi:1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107607
  18. Baabood A. The Geopolitics of Economic Development in the Middle East. Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center; 2024. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/02/the-geopolitics-of-economic-development-in-the-middle-east?lang=en&center=middle-east.
  19. Pasqui M, Felice A, Messagie M, et al. A new smart batteries management for Renewable Energy Communities. Sustain Energy Grids Netw. 2023;34:101043. doi:1016/j.segan.2023.101043
  20. Shao Q. Pathway through which COVID-19 exacerbates energy poverty and proposed relief measures. Energy Sustain Dev. 2023;74:1-5. doi:1016/j.esd.2023.03.008

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 July 2024
  • Revise Date: 04 December 2024
  • Accept Date: 04 December 2024
  • First Publish Date: 04 December 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics