Life After the HSIF: Lessons From Diffusion of Innovation for Sustaining the Impact of Embeddedness; Comment on “Early Career Outcomes of Embedded Research Fellows: An Analysis of the Health System Impact Fellowship Program”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

Implementation Scient Team, Health Innovation Hub, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada

Abstract

Kasaai and colleagues examine the career outcomes of alumni from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s (CIHR’s) Health System Impact Fellowship (HSIF), which embeds emerging scholars in health system organizations. The study of the 2017-2019 cohort shows all alumni are employed, with 92% working in Canada, and highlights their presence in academia, public service, healthcare, and private industry. Notably, 37% hold “hybrid” roles, blending academic and other sector work. While the fellowship effectively prepares fellows for impactful careers, the prevalence of hybrid roles raises concerns about sustaining academic partnerships post-fellowship. This commentary explores risks to embedded scholars, such as decentralization, competing innovations, and limited ongoing training, using the Diffusion of Innovations framework. It suggests strategies like strengthening network connectivity, focusing on high-impact innovations, increasing organizational embeddedness, and maintaining adaptability to ensure the longterm success of embedded scholars and the integration of evidence-based innovations in health systems.

Keywords


  1. Tomblin Murphy G, Sampalli T, Embrett M, et al. The network of scholars strategy: a case study of embedded research activities in Nova Scotia to advance health system impact and outcomes. Healthc Pap. 2022;20(3):33-43. doi:12927/hcpap.2022.26845
  2. Kasaai B, Thompson E, Glazier RH, McMahon M. Early career outcomes of embedded research fellows: an analysis of the health system impact fellowship program. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7333. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7333
  3. Chukwu OA, Nadigel J, Kasaai B, Boateng R, Glazier RH, McMahon M. Understanding the training, mentorship, and professional development priorities of early career embedded researchers. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024;39(5):1277-1297. doi:1002/hpm.3800
  4. Canadian Institute for Health Research. The Health System Impact Program. 2024. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/51211.html. Accessed September 20, 2024 .
  5. Menear M, Blanchette MA, Demers-Payette O, Roy D. A framework for value-creating learning health systems. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):79. doi:1186/s12961-019-0477-3
  6. Sim SM, Lai J, Aubrecht K, et al. CIHR health system impact fellows: reflections on "driving change" within the health system. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(6):325-328. doi:15171/ijhpm.2018.124
  7. Scarbrough H, Kyratsis Y. From spreading to embedding innovation in health care: implications for theory and practice. Health Care Manage Rev. 2022;47(3):236-244. doi:1097/hmr.0000000000000323
  8. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1962.
  9. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
  10. Gallego G, Haas M, Hall J, Viney R. Reducing the Use of Ineffective Health Care Interventions: An Evidence Check Rapid Review. Sax Institute; 2010.
  11. Gibson JL, Martin DK, Singer PA. Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):25. doi:1186/1472-6963-4-25
  12. Dearing JW, Cox JG. Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(2):183-190. doi:1377/hlthaff.2017.1104
  13. MacGregor H, Bloom G. Health systems research in a complex and rapidly changing context: ethical implications of major health systems change at scale. Dev World Bioeth. 2016;16(3):158-167. doi:1111/dewb.12115
  14. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Academy of Engineering (US) Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care. Fostering systems change to drive continuous learning in health care. In: Engineering a Learning Healthcare System: A Look at the Future: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK61956/. Accessed May 31, 2024.
  15. Meskó B, Drobni Z, Bényei É, Gergely B, Győrffy Z. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. Mhealth. 2017;3:38. doi:21037/mhealth.2017.08.07
  16. Tagscherer F, Carbon CC. Leadership for successful digitalization: A literature review on companies’ internal and external aspects of digitalization. Sustain Technol Entrep. 2023;2(2):100039. doi:1016/j.stae.2023.100039
  17. Meaghan Sim S, Lai J, Aubrecht K, et al. CIHR health system impact fellows: reflections on "driving change" within the health system. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(6):325-328. doi:15171/ijhpm.2018.124
  18. Damschroder LJ, Knighton AJ, Griese E, et al. Recommendations for strengthening the role of embedded researchers to accelerate implementation in health systems: findings from a state-of-the-art (SOTA) conference workgroup. Healthc (Amst). 2021;8(Suppl 1):100455. doi:1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100455
  19. Jackson GL, Damschroder LJ, White BS, et al. Balancing reality in embedded research and evaluation: low vs high embeddedness. Learn Health Syst. 2022;6(2):e10294. doi:1002/lrh2.10294
  20. Cheetham M, Wiseman A, Khazaeli B, et al. Embedded research: a promising way to create evidence-informed impact in public health? J Public Health (Oxf). 2018;40(suppl_1):i64-i70. doi:1093/pubmed/fdx125
  • Receive Date: 19 June 2024
  • Revise Date: 23 October 2024
  • Accept Date: 27 October 2024
  • First Publish Date: 28 October 2024