But Does It Work? Evidence, Policy-Making and Systems Thinking; Comment on “What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners’ Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Abstract

Systems thinking provides new ways of seeing the world, focusing attention on the relationship between elements in complex systems and the spaces inbetween. Haynes study shows that many policy-makers valued systems thinking as a new way to approach old problems. But they also wanted greater focus on useful policy solutions. This raises interesting questions about the tensions between complexity and simple, action-oriented solutions and how evidence is used in decision-making. Backstage understanding of the complexity of policy problems is matched with the frontstage need to focus on what works. This reflects trends in recent public policy for evidence centres providing decision-makers with toolkits and dashboards of ‘proven’ interventions. There are good examples of evaluations using systems thinking allowing for complexity while addressing policy-maker needs to be accountable for public investment and decisions. Strategic communication skills are needed to provide compelling stories which embrace systems thinking without losing clarity and impact.

Keywords

References

  1. Haynes A, Garvey K, Davidson S, Milat A. What can policy-makers get out of systems thinking? policy partners’ experiences of a systems-focused research collaboration in preventive health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(2):65-76. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.86
  2. Stevens A. Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. J Soc Policy. 2011;40(2):237-255. doi:10.1017/S0047279410000723
  3. Checkland K, Coleman A, Billings J, et al. National evaluation of the Vanguard new care models programme: Interim report: understanding the national support programme. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/projects/.  Accessed April 23, 2020.
  4. Matland RE. Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. J Public Adm Res Theory. 1995;5(2):145-174.
  5. Glasby J. If integration is the answer, what was the question? what next for English health and social care partnerships? Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(4):11. doi:10.5334/ijic.2535
  6. Shaw SE, Russell J, Parsons W, Greenhalgh T. The view from nowhere? how think tanks work to shape health policy. Crit Policy Stud. 2015;9(1):58-77. doi:10.1080/19460171.2014.964278
  7. Carey G, Malbon E, Carey N, Joyce A, Crammond B, Carey A. Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009002. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002
  8. Bristow D, Carter L, Martin S. Using evidence to improve policy and practice: the UK What Works Centres. Contemp Soc Sci. 2015;10(2):126-137. doi:10.1080/21582041.2015.1061688
  9. Boaz A, Davies H, Fraser A, Nutley S. What Works Now? Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press; 2019.
  10. Best A, Holmes B. Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Evid Policy. 2010;6(2):145-159. doi:10.1332/174426410x502284
  11. Lewis G, Vaithianathan R, Wright L, et al. Integrating care for high-risk patients in England using the virtual ward model: lessons in the process of care integration from three case sites. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e046. doi:10.5334/ijic.1150
  12. Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J, Macfarlane F, Butler C, Pawson R. How do you modernize a health service? a realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):391-416. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00562.x
  13. Lamont T, Barber N, de Pury J, et al. New approaches to evaluating complex health and care systems. BMJ. 2016;352:i154. doi:10.1136/bmj.i154
  14. Egan M, McGill E, Penney T, et al. NIHR SPHR Guidance on Systems Approaches to Local Public Health Evaluation. Part 2: What to consider when planning a systems evaluation. https://sphr.nihr.ac.uk.  Accessed April 23, 2020.
  15. Matthews FM. Letting go and holding on: the politics of performance management in the United Kingdom. Public Policy Adm. 2016;31(4):303-323. doi:10.1177/0952076715615186
  16. Cairney P, Oliver K. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):35. doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x
  17. Holmes B, Best A, Davies H, et al. Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evid Policy. 2017;13(3):539-560. doi:10.1332/174426416x14712553750311

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 April 2020
  • Revise Date: 04 May 2020
  • Accept Date: 05 May 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 May 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics