Community Health Workers as Influential Health System Actors and not “Just Another Pair Of Hands”

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

2 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, Maharashtra, India

3 State Health Systems Resource Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Background
Over the last 20 years, community health workers (CHWs) have become a mainstay of human resources for health in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A large body of research chronicles CHWs’ experience of their work. In this study we focus on 2 narratives that stand out in the literature. The first is the idea that social, economic and health system contexts intersect to undermine CHWs’ experience of their work, and that a key factor underpinning this experience is that LMIC health systems tend to view CHWs as just an ‘extra pair of hands’ to be called upon to provide ‘technical fixes.’ In this study we show the dynamic and evolving nature of CHW programmes and CHW identities and the need, therefore, for new understandings.

 
Methods
A qualitative case study was carried out of the Indian CHW program (CHWs are called accredited social health activists: ASHAs). It aimed to answer the research question: How do ASHAs experience being CHWs, and what shapes their experience and performance? In depth interviews were conducted with 32 purposively selected ASHAs and key informants. Analysis was focused on interpreting and on developing analytical accounts of ASHAs’ experiences of being CHWs; it was iterative and occurred throughout the research. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analysed using a framework approach (with Nvivo 11).

 
Results
CHWs resent being treated as just another pair of hands at the beck and call of formal health workers. The experience of being a CHW is evolving, and many are accumulating substantial social capital over time – emerging as influential social actors in the communities they serve. CHWs are covertly and overtly acting to subvert the structural forces that undermine their performance and work experience.

 
Conclusion
CHWs have the potential to be influential actors in the communities they serve and in frontline health services. Health systems and health researchers need to be cognizant of and consciously engage with this emerging global social dynamic around CHWs. Such an approach can help guide the development of optimal strategies to support CHWs to fulfil their role in achieving health and social development goals.

Highlights

 

Supplementary File 1 (Download)

Supplementary File 2 (Download)

 

Keywords

References

  1. Walt G. Just Another Pair of Hands: Community Health Workers. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1990.
  2. Perry HB, Zulliger R, Rogers MM. Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:399-421. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354
  3. Lewin SA, Babigumira SM, Bosch-Capblanch X, et al. Lay Health Workers in Primary and Community Health Care: A Systematic Review of Trials. Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa; 2006.
  4. Lehmann U, Sanders D. Community health workers: What do we know about them? The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using community health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  5. Haines A, Sanders D, Lehmann U, et al. Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2121-2131. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60325-0
  6. Kane SS, Gerretsen B, Scherpbier R, Dal Poz M, Dieleman M. A realist synthesis of randomised control trials involving use of community health workers for delivering child health interventions in low and middle income countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:286. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-286
  7. Kok M, de Koning K, Ormel H, Kane S. International literature review: on close-to-community providers: an analysis of systematic reviews on effectiveness and a synthesis of studies including factors influencing performance of CTC. REACHOUT Consortium; 2014.
  8. Zulu JM, Kinsman J, Michelo C, Hurtig AK. Integrating national community-based health worker programmes into health systems: a systematic review identifying lessons learned from low-and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:987. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-987
  9. Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, Tien M. Community Health Worker Incentives and Disincentives: How They Affect Motivation, Retention, and Sustainability. Arlington, Virginia: Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival Project (BASICS II); 2001.
  10. Bajpai N, Dholakia RH. Improving the Performance of Accredited Social Health Activists in India (Working Paper No. 1). New York, NY: Columbia University; 2011. 40-1.
  11. Maes K, Kalofonos I. Becoming and remaining community health workers: perspectives from Ethiopia and Mozambique. Soc Sci Med. 2013;87:52-59. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.026
  12. Bhatia K. Performance-based incentives of the ASHA scheme: stakeholders' perspectives. Econ Polit Wkly. 2014;49(22):145-151.
  13. Bhatia K. Community health worker programs in India: a rights-based review. Perspect Public Health. 2014;134(5):276-282. doi:10.1177/1757913914543446
  14. Mishra A. 'Trust and teamwork matter': community health workers' experiences in integrated service delivery in India. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):960-974. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.934877
  15. National Rural Health Mission (NRHM). Update on the ASHA Program. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2015.
  16. Fathima FN, Raju M, Varadharajan KS, Krishnamurthy A, Ananthkumar SR, Mony PK. Assessment of 'accredited social health activists'-a national community health volunteer scheme in Karnataka State, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2015;33(1):137-145.
  17. Kok MC, Kane SS, Tulloch O, et al. How does context influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? evidence from the literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:13. doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0001-3
  18. Kane S, Kok M, Ormel H, et al. Limits and opportunities to community health worker empowerment: a multi-country comparative study. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:27-34. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.019
  19. Sarin E, Sooden A, Kole S, Lunsford S. Identification of challenges and needs to improve community health workers performance: narratives of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) from two Indian districts. J Public Health Dev Ctries. 2016;2(2):173-182.
  20. Sarin E, Lunsford SS. How female community health workers navigate work challenges and why there are still gaps in their performance: a look at female community health workers in maternal and child health in two Indian districts through a reciprocal determinism framework. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):44. doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0222-3
  21. Naimoli JF, Perry HB, Townsend JW, Frymus DE, McCaffery JA. Strategic partnering to improve community health worker programming and performance: features of a community-health system integrated approach. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:46. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0041-3
  22. Scott K, Beckham SW, Gross M, et al. What do we know about community-based health worker programs? a systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x
  23. Steege R, Taegtmeyer M, McCollum R, et al. How do gender relations affect the working lives of close to community health service providers? empirical research, a review and conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med. 2018;209:1-13. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.002
  24. Schneider H. The governance of national community health worker programmes in low-and middle-income countries: an empirically based framework of governance principles, purposes and tasks. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(1):18-27. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.92
  25. National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC). ASHA–Which Way Forward? Evaluation of ASHA Programme. New Delhi: NHSRC; 2011:7-10.
  26. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, eds. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994:173-194.
  27. National Health Mission Maharashtra. Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) Scheme. https://www.nrhm.maharashtra.gov.in/guideasha.pdf.  Accessed January 11, 2020.
  28. Saprii L, Richards E, Kokho P, Theobald S. Community health workers in rural India: analysing the opportunities and challenges Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) face in realising their multiple roles. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:95. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0094-3
  29. George MS, Pant S, Devasenapathy N, Ghosh-Jerath S, Zodpey SP. Motivating and demotivating factors for community health workers: a qualitative study in urban slums of Delhi, India. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2017;6(1):82-89. doi:10.4103/2224-3151.206170
  30. van de Ruit C. Unintended consequences of community health worker programs in South Africa. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(11):1535-1548. doi:10.1177/1049732319857059
  31. Shet AS, Rao A, Jebaraj P, et al. Lay health workers perceptions of an anemia control intervention in Karnataka, India: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):720. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4758-x
  32. Najafizada SA, Bourgeault IL, Labonte R, Packer C, Torres S. Community health workers in Canada and other high-income countries: a scoping review and research gaps. Can J Public Health. 2015;106(3):e157-164. doi:10.17269/cjph.106.4747
  33. Sabo S, Allen CG, Sutkowi K, Wennerstrom A. Community health workers in the United States: challenges in identifying, surveying, and supporting the workforce. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1964-1969. doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.304096
  34. Fligstein N. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociol Theory. 2001;19(2):105-125. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00132
  35. Mukhopadhyay M. Feminist Subversion and Complicity: Governmentalities and Gender Knowledge in South Asia. New Dehi: Zubaan Books; 2016.
  36. Appadurai A. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environ Urban. 2001;13(2):23-43. doi:10.1177/095624780101300203
  37. Roalkvam S. Health governance in India: citizenship as situated practice. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):910-926. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.941900
  38. Mlotshwa L, Harris B, Schneider H, Moshabela M. Exploring the perceptions and experiences of community health workers using role identity theory. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:28045. doi:10.3402/gha.v8.28045
  39. Peter F. Critical realism, feminist epistemology, and the emancipatory potential of science: a comment on Lawson and Harding. Fem Econ. 2003;9(1):93-101. doi:10.1080/13545700110059289
  40. Einspahr J. Structural domination and structural freedom: a feminist perspective. Fem Rev. 2010;94(1):1-19. doi:10.1057/fr.2009.40
  41. Barker D. Emancipatory for whom? a comment on critical realism. Fem Econ. 2003;9(1):103-108. doi:10.1080/13545700110059270
  42. Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1675-1683. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 10, Issue 8
August 2021
Pages 465-474

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 12 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 13 April 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 August 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics