Coming Full Circle: How Health Worker Motivation and Performance in Results-Based Financing Arrangements Hinges on Strong and Adaptive Health Systems

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2 Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3 Independent Consultant

4 World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA

5 Ministry of Health and Child Care, Government of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe

Abstract

Background
This paper presents findings from a study which sought to understand why health workers working under the results-based financing (RBF) arrangements in Zimbabwe reported being satisfied with the improvements in working conditions and compensation, but paradoxically reported lower motivation levels compared to those not working under RBF arrangements.
 
Methods
A qualitative study was conducted amongst health workers and managers working in health facilities that were implementing the RBF arrangements and those that were not. Through purposeful sampling, four facilities in RBF implementing districts that reported poor motivation and satisfaction, were included as study sites. Four facilities located in non-RBF districts which reported high motivation and satisfaction were also included. Data was collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using the framework approach.
 
Results
Results based financing arrangements introduce a wide range of new institutional arrangements, roles, tasks, and ways of doing things, for facility staff, facility managers and, district and provincial health management teams. Findings reveal that insufficient preparedness of people and processes for this change, constrained managers and workers performance. Results based financing arrangements introduce explicit and tacit changes, including but not limited to, incentive logics, in the system. Findings show that unless systematic efforts are made to enable the absorption of these changes in the system: eg, through reconfiguring the decision space available at various levels, through clarification of accountability relationships, through building personnel and process capacities, before instituting changes, the full potential of the RBF arrangements cannot be realised.
 
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates the importance of analysing existing institutional, management and governance arrangements and capabilities and taking these into account when designing and implementing RBF interventions. Introducing RBF arrangements cannot alone overcome chronic systemic weaknesses. For a system wide change, as RBF arguably is, to be effected, explicit organisational change management processes need to be put in place, across the system. Carefully designed processes, which take into account the interest and willingness of various actors to change, and which are cognizant of and constructively engage with potential bottlenecks and points of resistance, should accompany any health system change initiative.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Gautier L, Tosun J, De Allegri M, Ridde V. How do diffusion entrepreneurs spread policies? Insights from performance-based financing in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 2018;110:160-175. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.032
  2. Paul E, Albert L, Bisala BNS, et al. Performance-based financing in low-income and middle-income countries: isn’t it time for a rethink? BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000664. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000664
  3. Bonfrer I, Van de Poel E, Van Doorslaer E. The effects of performance incentives on the utilization and quality of maternal and child care in Burundi. Soc Sci Med. 2014;123:96-104. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.004
  4. Spisak C, Morgan L, Eichler R, Rosen J, Serumaga B, Wang A. Results-Based Financing in Mozambique’s Central Medical Store: A Review After 1 Year. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(1):165-177. doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00173
  5. Sieleunou I, Turcotte-Tremblay AM, Fotso JT, et al. Setting performance-based financing in the health sector agenda: a case study in Cameroon. Global Health. 2017;13(1):52. doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0278-9
  6. Schuster RC, de Sousa O, Reme AK, et al. Performance-Based Financing Empowers Health Workers Delivering Prevention of Vertical Transmission of HIV Services and Decreases Desire to Leave in Mozambique. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(7):630-644. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.137
  7. Nguyen HTH, Gopalan S, Mutasa R, et al. Impact of Results-Based Financing on Health Worker Satisfaction and Motivation in Zimbabwe: Implications for program design and implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2015.
  8. Grittner AM. Results-based Financing: Evidence from performance-based financing in the health sector. Bonn: German Development Institute; 2013.
  9. Musgrove P. Financial and Other Rewards for Good Performance or Results: A Guided Tour of Concepts and Terms and a Short Glossary. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011.
  10. World Bank. Learning from Implementation: Process Monitoring and Evaluation II of Zimbabwe’s Results-Based Financing Project. The case of Mutoko, Chiredzi, Nkayi and Kariba districts. Washington: The World Bank Group; 2015.
  11. World Bank. Rewarding Provider Performance to Improve Quality and Coverage of Maternal and Child Health Outcomes. Zimbabwe Results-Based Financing Pilot Program: Evidence to Inform Policy and Management Decisions. Washington: The World Bank Group; 2016.
  12. Shen GC, Nguyen HT, Das A, et al. Incentives to change: effects of performance-based financing on health workers in Zambia. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0179-2
  13. Asiri SA, Rohrer WW, Al-Surimi K, Da’ar OO, Ahmed A. The association of leadership styles and empowerment with nurses’ organizational commitment in an acute health care setting: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2016;15:38. doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0161-7
  14. World Bank. Using results-based financing to achieve maternal & child health: Progress report. Health Results Innovations Trust Fund; 2013.
  15. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, eds. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994:173-194.
  16. Ssengooba F, McPake B, Palmer N. Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda--an “open-box” evaluation of a complex health system intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(2):377-383. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.050
  17. Turcotte-Tremblay AM, Spagnolo J, De Allegri M, Ridde V. Does performance-based financing increase value for money in low- and middle- income countries? A systematic review. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6(1):30. doi:10.1186/s13561-016-0103-9
  18. Renmans D, Holvoet N, Orach CG, Criel B. Opening the ‘black box’ of performance-based financing in low- and lower middle-income countries: a review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(9):1297-1309. doi:10.1093/heapol/czw045
  19. Mayaka Ma-Nitu S, Tembey L, Bigirimana E, et al. Towards constructive rethinking of PBF: perspectives of implementers in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Global Health. 2018;3:e001036. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001036
  20. Fritsche GB, Soeters R, Meessen B. Performance-Based Financing Toolkit. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2014.
  21. Lohmann J, Wilhelm D, Kambala C, Brenner S, Muula AS, De Allegri M. ‘The money can be a motivator, to me a little, but mostly PBF just helps me to do better in my job.’ An exploration of the motivational mechanisms of performance-based financing for health workers in Malawi. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(2):183-191. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx156
  22. Meessen B, Shroff ZC, Bigdeli M. From Scheme to System (Part 1): Notes on Conceptual and Methodological Innovations in the Multicountry Research Program on Scaling Up Results-Based Financing in Health Systems. Health Syst Reform. 2017;3(2):129-136. doi:10.1080/23288604.2017.1303561
  23. Paul E, Sossouhounto N, Eclou DS. Local stakeholders’ perceptions about the introduction of performance-based financing in Benin: a case study in two health districts. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(4):207-214. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.93
  24. Bhatnagar A, George AS. Motivating health workers up to a limit: partial effects of performance-based financing on working environments in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(7):868-877. doi:10.1093/heapol/czw002
  25. Bossert T. Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(10):1513-1527.
  26. Bossert TJ. Decision Space and Capacities in the Decentralization of Health Services in FijiComment on “Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(7):443-444. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.51
  27. Soeters R, Habineza C, Peerenboom PB. Performance-based financing and changing the district health system: experience from Rwanda. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(11):884-889.
  28. Daire J, Gilson L, Cleary S. Developing leadership and management competencies in low and middle-income country health systems: a review of the literature. South Africa: Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town; 2014.
  29. Okello DR, Gilson L. Exploring the influence of trust relationships on motivation in the health sector: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:16. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0007-5
  30. Fritzen SA. Strategic management of the health workforce in developing countries: what have we learned? Hum Resour Health. 2007;5:4. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-5-4
  31. Hendry C. Understanding and creating whole organizational change through learning theory. Hum Relat. 1996;49(5):621-641. doi:10.1177/001872679604900505
  32. Beer M, Eisenstat RA, Spector B. Why change programs don’t produce change. Harv Bus Rev. 1990;68(6):158-166.
  33. Muncer J, Kabwe C. An evaluation of how change is managed in practice and the key considerations for organisations undertaking a change. Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management. 2015;1(1):236-258.
  34. Witter S, Toonen J, Meessen B, Kagubare J, Fritsche G, Vaughan K. Performance-based financing as a health system reform: mapping the key dimensions for monitoring and evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:367. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-367
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 8, Issue 2
February 2019
Pages 101-111

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 17 February 2018
  • Revise Date: 15 August 2018
  • Accept Date: 29 September 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 February 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics