Introducing Critical Accounting for Governance as a Tool in Exploring the Commercial Determinants of Health

Document Type : Viewpoint

Authors

1 Department of Management, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK

2 School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

3 MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Introducing Critical Accounting for Governance as a Tool in Exploring the Commercial Determinants of Health

Keywords

Full Text

Introduction and Context

 

Commercial determinants of health (CDoH) are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO)1 as comprising “private sector activities that affect people’s health positively or negatively.” They “arise in the context of the provision of goods or services for payment and include commercial activities, as well as the environment in which commerce takes place.” Emerging literature examines the various health effects of commercial actors, such as lobbying and policy influence, product marketing and consumption and through systemlevel effects.2...(Read more...)

 

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Commercial Determinants of Health Factsheet. WHO; 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/commercial-determinants-of-health. Accessed December 7, 2021.
  2. Gilmore AB, Fabbri A, Baum F, et al. Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health. Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1194-1213. doi:1016/s0140-6736(23)00013-2
  3. Critical Perspectives on Accounting - Aims and Scope. 2022. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting. Accessed April 5, 2022.
  4. Business for Health, Confederation of British Industry. Business Framework for Health: Supporting Businesses and Employers in Their Role to Enhance and Level Up the Health of the Nation. Business for Health, Confederation of British Industry; 2021.
  5. Marmot MG, Rose G, Shipley M, Hamilton PJ. Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 1978;32(4):244-249. doi:1136/jech.32.4.244
  6. Employment Conditions Knowledge Network (EMCONET). Employment Conditions and Health Inequalities: Final Report to the WHO CSDH. Geneva: WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health; 2007.
  7. McCartney G, Hearty W, Arnot J, Popham F, Cumbers A, McMaster R. Impact of political economy on population health: a systematic review of reviews. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(6):e1-e12. doi:2105/ajph.2019.305001
  8. Wang YT, Mechkova V, Andersson F. Does democracy enhance health? New empirical evidence 1900-2012. Polit Res Q. 2019;72(3):554-569. doi:1177/1065912918798506
  9. Bollyky TJ, Templin T, Cohen M, Schoder D, Dieleman JL, Wigley S. The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1628-1640. doi:1016/s0140-6736(19)30235-1
  10. Collison D, Dey C, Hannah G, Stevenson L. Anglo‐American capitalism: the role and potential role of social accounting. Account Audit Account J. 2010;23(8):956-981. doi:1108/09513571011092510
  11. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015.
  12. Sjöberg O. Corporate governance and earnings inequality in the OECD countries 1979-2000. Eur Sociol Rev. 2009;25(5):519-533. doi:1093/esr/jcn069
  13. Hall PA, Soskice D. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. OUP Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. doi:1093/0199247757.001.0001
  14. Collison D, Cross S, Ferguson J, Power D, Stevenson L. Shareholder Primacy in UK Corporate Law: An Exploration of the Rationale and Evidence. London: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA); 2011.
  15. Marmot MG, Allen J. From science to policy. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, Glymour M, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014:562-576.
  16. Ottersen OP, Dasgupta J, Blouin C, et al. The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):630-667. doi:1016/s0140-6736(13)62407-1
  17. Ferguson J, Power D, Stevenson L, Collison D. Shareholder protection, income inequality and social health: a proposed research agenda. Account Forum. 2017;41(3):253-265. doi:1016/j.accfor.2016.12.005
  18. Contrafatto M, Ferguson J, Power D, Stevenson L, Collison D. Understanding power-related strategies and initiatives. Account Audit Account J. 2020;33(3):559-587. doi:1108/aaaj-06-2018-3529
  19. Allen LN, Wigley S, Holmer H. Implementation of non-communicable disease policies from 2015 to 2020: a geopolitical analysis of 194 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(11):e1528-e1538. doi:1016/s2214-109x(21)00359-4
  20. Vitols S, Kluge N. Introduction. In: Vitols S, Kluge N, eds. The Sustainable Company: A New Approach to Corporate Governance. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI); 2011.
  21. McQuaid R, Canduela J, Hollywood E, Bond S, Richard A, Blackledge G. Fit for Work? Health and Wellbeing of Employees in Employee Owned Businesses. Edinburgh Napier University, Employee Ownership Association; 2012.
  22. Sikka P. Corporate governance: what about the workers? Account Audit Account J. 2008;21(7):955-977. doi:1108/09513570810907438
  23. World Bank. GCI 4.0: 1.G Corporate Governance. World Bank; 2022.
  24. Armingeon K, Engler K, Leeman L. Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2020. Zurich: Department of Political Science; 2022.
  25. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Industrial Relations Index. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/Industrial-relations-index?period=2013-2017&breakdown=index&mode=all&country=all. Accessed January 1, 2023. Published 2021.
  26. How do collective bargaining systems and workers’ voice arrangements compare across OEC and EU countries? OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database; 2022.
  27. World Values Survey Association. World Values Survey. 2022. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSNewsShow.jsp?ID=465. Accessed January 1, 2023.
  28. European Values Survey. European Values Survey. 2023. https://europeanvaluesstudy.eu/. Accessed January 1, 2023.
  29. Edelman Data & Intelligence. Edelman Trust Barometer 2022. Edelman Data & Intelligence; 2022.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 24 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 20 November 2023
  • First Publish Date: 21 November 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics