Towards Critical Analysis of the Political Determinants of Health; Comment on “How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

Abstract

The recent perspective article “How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention,” by Lencucha and Throw, interrogates how the dominant neoliberal paradigm restricts meaningful policy action to prevent non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It contributes an NCD perspective to the existing literature on neoliberalism and health, which to date has been dominated by a focus on HIV, gender and trade agreements. It further advances the emerging commercial determinants of health (CDoH) scholarship by calling for more nuanced analysis of how the governance of both health and the economy facilitates corporate influence in policy-making. In political science terms, Lencucha and Throw are calling for greater structural analysis. However, their focus on the pragmatic, as opposed to political, aspects of neoliberalism reflects a hesitancy within health scholarship to engage in political analysis. This depoliticization of health serves neoliberal interests by delegitimizing critical questions about who sustains and benefits from current institutional norms. Lencucha and Throw’s call for greater interrogation of the structures of neoliberalism forms a basis from which to advance analysis of the political determinants of health.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Mackenbach JP. Political determinants of health. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(1):2. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt183
  2. Lencucha R, Thow AM. How neoliberalism is shaping the supply of unhealthy commodities and what this means for NCD prevention. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(9):514-520. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.56
  3. Gill S, Benatar S. Global Health Governance and Global Power: A Critical Commentary on the Lancet-University of Oslo Commission Report. Int J Health Serv. 2016;46(2):346-365. doi:10.1177/0020731416631734
  4. Msimang S. HIV/AIDS, globalisation and the international women's movement. Gend Dev. 2003;11(1):109-113.
  5. O’Manique C. Global Neoliberalism and Aids Policy: International responses to sub-Saharan Africa’s pandemic. Stud Polit Econ. 2004;73(1):47-68. doi:10.1080/19187033.2004.11675151
  6. Love R. Corporate wealth or public health? WTO/TRIPS flexibilities and access to HIV/AIDS antiretroviral drugs by developing countries. Dev Pract. 2007;17(2):208-219. doi:10.1080/09614520701195915
  7. Friel S, Gleeson D, Thow AM, et al. A new generation of trade policy: potential risks to diet-related health from the trans pacific partnership agreement. Global Health. 2013;9:46. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-46
  8. McKee M, Stuckler D. Revisiting the corporate and commercial determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(9):1167-1170. doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304510
  9. Kickbusch I, Allen L, Franz C. The commercial determinants of health. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(12):e895-e896. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30217-0
  10. Sibeon R. Agency, structure, and social chance as cross-disciplinary concepts. Politics. 1999;19(3):139-144. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.00097
  11. Giddens A. Agency, Structure. In: Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan Education UK; 1979.
  12. Cerny PG. Embedding Neoliberalism: The Evolution of a Hegemonic Paradigm. The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy. 2008;2(1):1-46.
  13. Harvey D. Neoliberalism Is a Political Project. Jacobin. July 23, 2016. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/david-harvey-neoliberalism-capitalism-labor-crisis-resistance/.  Accessed 20 September 2019.
  14. Gill S, Benatar SR. History, structure and agency in global health governance: Comment on "Global health governance challenges 2016 - are we ready?" Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(4):237-241. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.119
  15. Kay A, Williams O. Introduction: The International Political Economy of Global Health Governance. In: Kay A, Williams O, eds. Global Health Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2009:1-23.
  16. Reich MR. Political economy analysis for health. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(8):514. doi:10.2471/blt.19.238311
  17. Gill S, Benatar S. Global Health Governance and Global Power: A Critical Commentary on the Lancet-University of Oslo Commission Report. Int J Health Serv. 2016;46(2):346-365. doi:10.1177/0020731416631734
  18. Yamin AE, Boulanger VM. Embedding sexual and reproductive health and rights in a transformational development framework: lessons learned from the MDG targets and indicators. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21(42):74-85. doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(13)42727-1
  19. Bambra C, Fox D, Scott-Samuel A. Towards a politics of health. Health Promot Int. 2005;20(2):187-193. doi:10.1093/heapro/dah608
  20. Williams SJ. Beyond Meaning, Discourse and the Empirical World: Critical Realist Reflections on Health. Soc Theory Health. 2003;1(1):42-71. doi:10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700004
  21. Smith J. Civil Society Organizations and the Global Response to HIV/AIDS. London: Routledge; 2017.
  22. Benatar S, Upshur R, Gill S. Understanding the relationship between ethics, neoliberalism and power as a step towards improving the health of people and our planet. The Anthropocene Review. 2018;5(2):155-176. doi:10.1177/2053019618760934
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 9, Issue 3
March 2020
Pages 121-123

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 22 October 2019
  • Accept Date: 23 October 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics