Challenging Institutional Norms to Improve Local-Level Policy for Health and Health Equity; Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Abstract

The article by Susanne Hagen and colleagues on Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway discusses actions by municipal governments to assess and address heath inequities within their respective regions, as required under the Norwegian Public Health Act (PHA). Although the broad intent of the Norwegian government is to encourage action on social determinants of health (SDH), Hagen et al find that many of the initiatives undertaken by municipalities ‘tend to cash out as single, targeted initiatives,’ and focus on individual behaviours. In this commentary, I use the concept of place-based policy and ideas from policy theory on the institutional behaviours of public policy agencies and services, to discuss reasons behind this narrowing of perspective and policy action. I argue in favour of an alternative approach involving public agencies and services supporting processes of community-led action and social change.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Hagen S, Ivar Overgard K, Helgesen M, Fosse E, Torp S. Health promotion at local level in Norway: the use of public health coordinators and health overviews to promote fair distribution among social groups. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018; Forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.22
  2. Fisher M, Baum FE, MacDougall C, Newman L, McDermott D. To what extent do australian health policy documents address social determinants of health and health equity? J Soc Policy. 2016;45(3):545-564. doi:10.1017/S0047279415000756
  3. Fisher M, Baum FE, MacDougall C, Newman L, McDermott D, Phillips C. Intersectoral action on SDH and equity in Australian health policy. Health Promot Int. 2017;32(6):953-963. doi:10.1093/heapro/daw035
  4. Kickbusch I. Health in All Policies: The evolution of the concept of horizontal health governance. In: Kickbusch I, Buckett K, eds. Implementing Health in All Policies: Adelaide 2010. Adelaide: Department of Health, Government of South Australia; 2010.
  5. Bradford N. Place-based Public Policy: Towards a New Urban and Community Agenda for Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2005.
  6. Neumark D, Simpson H. Place-Based Policies. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2014.
  7. Centre for Community Child Health. Place-Based Initiatives, Transforming Communities: Proceedings From the Place-Based Approaches Roundtable. Melbourne: Royal Children's Hospital; 2012.
  8. NHS Health Scotland. Asset Based Approaches to Health Improvement. Evidence for Action Glasgow: NHS Health Scotland; 2012.
  9. Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  10. Smith K. Institutional filters: The translation and re-circulation of ideas about health inequalities within policy. Policy Polit. 2013;41(1):81-100. doi:10.1332/030557312X655413
  11. Beland D, Henry Cox R. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  12. Laverack G, Labonte R. A planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):255-262.
  13. Empowered Communities. Empowered Communities: Empowered Peoples Design Report. Canberra: Wunan Foundation Inc; 2015.
  14. Tsey K. The control factor: a neglected social determinant of health. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1629. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61678-5
  15. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
  16. Hunter BD, Neiger B, West J. The importance of addressing social determinants of health at the local level: the case for social capital. Health Soc Care Community. 2011;19(5):522-530. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.00999.x
  17. National Institute for Health Research. Communities in control UK: 2018. http://sphr.nihr.ac.uk/health-inequalities/home/.
  18. Monbiot G. The town that’s found a potent cure for illness: community. The Guardian. 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/21/town-cure-illness-community-frome-somerset-isolation.
  19. Mackenbach JP. The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(4):761-769. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.031
  20. Mowbray M. What became of The Local State? Neo-liberalism, community development and local government. Community Dev J. 2011;46(suppl 1):i132-153. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq051
  21. Wallerstein N. Empowerment and health: the theory and practice of community change. Community Dev J. 1993;28(3):218-227. doi:10.1093/cdj/28.3.218
  22. Taylor M. Public Policy in the Community. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 16 July 2018
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 October 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics