“It’s About the Idea Hitting the Bull’s Eye”: How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

IDEAS Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Abstract

Background
Since the global economic crisis, a harsher economic climate and global commitments to address the problems of global health and poverty have led to increased donor interest to fund effective health innovations that offer value for money. Simultaneously, further aid effectiveness is being sought through encouraging governments in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to strengthen their capacity to be self-supporting, rather than donor reliant. In practice, this often means donors fund pilot innovations for three to five years to demonstrate effectiveness and then advocate to the national government to adopt them for scale-up within country-wide health systems. We aim to connect the literature on scaling-up health innovations in LMICs with six key principles of aid effectiveness: country ownership; alignment; harmonisation; transparency and accountability; predictability; and civil society engagement and participation, based on our analysis of interviewees’ accounts of scale-up in such settings.

 
Methods
We analysed 150 semi-structured qualitative interviews, to explore the factors catalysing and inhibiting the scale-up of maternal and newborn health (MNH) innovations in Ethiopia, northeast Nigeria and the State of Uttar Pradesh, India and identified links with the aid effectiveness principles. Our interviewees were purposively selected for their knowledge of scale-up in these settings, and represented a range of constituencies. We conducted a systematic analysis of the expanded field notes, using a framework approach to code a priori themes and identify emerging themes in NVivo 10.

 
Results
Our analysis revealed that actions by donors, implementers and recipient governments to promote the scale-up of innovations strongly reflected many of the aid effectiveness principles embraced by well-known international agreements - including the Paris Declaration of Aid Effectiveness. Our findings show variations in the extent to which these six principles have been adopted in what are three diverse geographical settings, raising important implications for scaling health innovations in low- and middle-income countries.

 
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that if donors, implementers and recipient governments were better able to put these principles into practice, the prospects for scaling externally funded health innovations as part of country health policies and programmes would be enhanced.

Highlights

Commentaries Published on this Paper

  • Aid Effectiveness in the Sustainable Development Goals Era; Comment on ““It’s About the Idea Hitting the Bull’s Eye”: How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations”

             Abstract | PDF

  • Ownership in Name, But not Necessarily in Action; Comment on “It’s About the Idea Hitting the Bull’s Eye”: How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations”

            Abstract | PDF

  • Effective Aid for Hitting the Bull’s Eye; Comment on “It’s About the Idea Hitting the Bull’s Eye”: How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations”

            Abstract | PDF

Keywords

Main Subjects

Full Text

"Watch the Video Summary"

References

  1. Gawande A. Slow ideas. New Yorker. July 29, 2013. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/07/29/slow-ideas. Accessed June 30, 2016.
  2. Paina L, Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(5):365-373. doi:10.1093/heapol/czr054
  3. Sgaier SK, Ramakrishnan A, Dhingra N, et al. How the Avahan HIV prevention program transitioned from the Gates Foundation to the government of India. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(7):1265-1273. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0646
  4. Spicer N, Bhattacharya D, Dimka R, et al. 'Scaling-up is a craft not a science': Catalysing scale-up of health innovations in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 2014;121:30-38. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.046
  5. Yamey G. What are the barriers to scaling up health interventions in low and middle income countries? A qualitative study of academic leaders in implementation science. Global Health. 2012;8:11. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-8-11
  6. Barker PM, Reid A, Schall MW. A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa. Implement Sci. 2016;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0374-x
  7. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Taylor LA, et al. A model for scale up of family health innovations in low-income and middle-income settings: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000987
  8. Dearing JW. Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):99-108. doi:10.1097/01.PHH.0000311886.98627.b7
  9. Mangham LJ, Hanson K. Scaling up in international health: what are the key issues? Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(2):85-96. doi:10.1093/heapol/czp066
  10. Simmons R, Fajans P, Ghiron L, Johnson B. Managing scaling up. In: Cash R, Chowdhury A, Smith G, Ahmed F. From One to Many: Scaling up Health Programs in Low Income Countries. Dhaka: University Press Limited of Dhaka; 2010.
  11. Spicer N, Berhanu D, Bhattacharya D, et al. 'The stars seem aligned': a qualitative study to understand the effects of context on scale-up of maternal and newborn health innovations in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria. Global Health. 2016;12(1):75. doi:10.1186/s12992-016-0218-0
  12. World Health Organization, ExpandNet. Practical Guidance for Scaling up Health Service Innovations. Geneva: WHO; 2009.
  13. World Health Organization, ExpandNet. Nine Steps for Developing a Scaling-up Strategy. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  14. World Health Organization, ExpandNet. Beginning with the End in Mind: Planning Pilot Projects and Other Programmatic Research for Successful Scaling up. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
  15. Yamey G. Scaling up global health interventions: a proposed framework for success. PLoS Med. 2011;8(6):e1001049. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001049
  16. Hanson K, Ranson MK, Oliveira-Cruz V, Mills A. Expanding access to priority health interventions: a framework for understanding the constraints to scaling-up. J Int Dev. 2003;15(1):1-14. doi:10.1002/jid.963
  17. Simmons R, Fajans P, Ghiron L. Scaling up Health Service Delivery: From Pilot Innovations to Policies and Programmes. Geneva: WHO; 2007. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/strategic_approach/9789241563512/en/. Accessed May 18, 2016.
  18. Cooley L, Kohl R. Scaling up – from Vision to Large-scale Change: a Management Framework for Practitioners. Arlington: Management Services International; 2006.
  19. Gilson L, Schneider H. Understanding health service access: concepts and experience. Global Forum Update Research Health. 2007;4:28-32.
  20. Harmer A, Spicer N, Aleshkina J, et al. Has global fund support for civil society advocacy in the former Soviet Union established meaningful engagement or 'a lot of jabber about nothing'? Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(3):299-308. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs060
  21. Shiffman J. Issue attention in global health: the case of newborn survival. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):2045-2049. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60710-6
  22. OECD. The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for Action: 2005/2008. Paris: OECD; 2005/2008. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/34428351.pdf. Accessed  February 5, 2016.
  23. OECD. The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. Paris: OECD; 2012. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/Busan%20partnership.pdf. Accessed  February 5, 2016.
  24. Countries, Territories and Organisations Adhering to the Paris Declaration and AAA. OECD website. http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/busanadherents.htm.  Accessed February 5, 2016.
  25. Countries, Territories and Organisations Adhering to the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. OECD website. http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/busanadherents.htm. Accessed  February 5, 2016.
  26. IHP+ Partners. IHP+ web site. http://www.internationalhealthpartnership.net/en/ihp-partners/.  Accessed  February 5, 2016.
  27. Bhutta ZA, Aleem S. A review of external assistance and aid effectiveness for maternal and child health: challenges and opportunities. WIDER Working Papers 099:29. Helsinki: United Nations University; 2009. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/WP2013-099.pdf. Accessed  February 9, 2016.
  28. Esser DE. Elusive accountabilities in the HIV scale-up: 'ownership' as a functional tautology. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(1-2):43-56. doi:10.1080/17441692.2013.879669
  29. Leiderer S. Donor coordination for effective government policies? Implementation of the new aid effectiveness agenda in health and education in Zambia. WIDER Working Papers: 2013/049. Helsinki: United Nations University; 2013. https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/donor-coordination-effective-government-policies. Accessed February 18, 2016.
  30. Paul E, Ireland M, Martini J, et al. Results from implementation of aid effectiveness principles in the health sector in Mali. J Public Health Policy. 2013;34(1):140-152. doi:10.1057/jphp.2012.64
  31. Shorten T, Taylor M, Spicer N, Mounier-Jack S, McCoy D. The International Health Partnership Plus: rhetoric or real change? Results of a self-reported survey in the context of the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan. Global Health. 2012;8:13. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-8-13
  32. Sridhar D. Seven challenges in international development assistance for health and ways forward. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38(3):459-469. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00505.x
  33. The monitoring framework of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation.GPEDC website. http://effectivecooperation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/GPEDC-Monitoring-Framework-10-Indicators.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2016.
  34. OECD. Aid effectiveness in the Health Sector: Progress and Lessons. Paris: OECD; 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264178014-en. Accessed June 10, 2016.
  35. Halcomb EJ, Davidson PM. Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19(1):38-42. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001
  36. World Bank Country and Lending Groups: Current classification by income in xls format; 2017. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.  Accessed August 23, 2017.
  37. Martinez-Alvarez M, Acharya A. Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector. WIDER Working Paper 2012/069. Helsinki: United Nations University; 2012. https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/aid-effectiveness-health-sector. Accessed January 21, 2016.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 June 2017
  • Revise Date: 22 November 2017
  • Accept Date: 23 January 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 August 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics