Assessing Patient Organization Participation in Health Policy: A Comparative Study in France and Italy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece

2 Community Mental Health Centre, University Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece

3 Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

4 Europa Donna France, Paris, France

5 Bulgarian National Patients’ Organization, Sofia, Bulgaria

6 FSNB Health & Care, Paris, France

Abstract

Background
Even though there are many patient organizations across Europe, their role in impacting health policy decisions and reforms has not been well documented. In line with this, the present study endeavours to fill this gap in the international literature. To this end, it aims to validate further a previously developed instrument (the Health Democracy Index - HDI) measuring patient organization participation in health policy decision-making. In addition, by utilizing this tool, it aims to provide a snapshot of the degree and impact of cancer patient organization (CPO) participation in Italy and France. 
 
Methods
A convenient sample of 188 members of CPOs participated in the study (95 respondents from 10 CPOs in Italy and 93 from 12 CPOs in France). Participants completed online a self-reported questionnaire, encompassing the 9-item index and questions enquiring about the type and impact of participation in various facets of health policy decisionmaking. The psychometric properties of the scale were explored by performing factor analysis (construct validity) and by computing Cronbach α (internal consistency).
 
Results
Findings indicate that the index has good internal consistency and the construct it taps is unidimensional. The degree and impact of CPO participation in health policy decision-making were found to be low in both countries; however in Italy they were comparatively lower than in France.
 
Conclusion
In conclusion, the HDI can be effectively used in international policy and research contexts. CPOs participation is low in Italy and France and concerted efforts should be made on upgrading their role in health policy decision-making.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, Sheridan S, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Patient Participation: Current Knowledge and Applicability to Patient Safety. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(1):53-62. doi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0248
  2. Cahill J. Patient participation - a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7(2):119-128. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.1998.00132.x
  3. Tattersall RL. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century. Clin Med. 2002;2(3):227-229. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.2-3-227
  4. Dicker A, Armstrong D. Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice. BMJ. 1995;311(7013):1137-1139. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1137
  5. Florin D. Public involvement in health care. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):159-161. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7432.159
  6. Bowie C, Richardson A, Sykes W. Consulting the public about health service priorities. BMJ. 1995;311(7013):1155-1158. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1155
  7. Thompson AG. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(6):1297-1310. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002
  8. Coulter A. Whatever happened to shared decision-making? Health Expect. 2002;5(3):185-186. doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00190.x
  9. Coulter A. Involving patients: representation or representativeness? Health Expect. 2002;5(1):1. doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00174.x.
  10. Coulter A, Parsons SJ. Where Are The Patients In Decision-Making About Their Own Care? Denmark: World Health Organization; 2008.
  11. Souliotis K. Looking for democracy in health amidst the fiscal crisis: patient participation in health policy decision making. In: Souliotis K, ed. Democracy, Citizens and Health Policy: Participation in Decision Making, Lobbying and Patient Associations (in Greek). 1st ed. Athens Greece: Papazisis; 2016:23-51.
  12. Souliotis K. The concept of Health Democracy: Documentation of a New Approach in Health Policy Decision Making. The Health Democracy Index. Paper presented at: 41 PanHellenic Medical Conference; 2015.
  13. Van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Government Influence on Patient Organizations. Health Care Analysis. 2011;19(4):329-351. doi:10.1007/s10728-010-0155-7.
  14. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Ottawa, Canada: WHO; 1986.
  15. Hunter DJ. Getting knowledge on 'wicked problems' in health promotion into action. In Clavier C, De Leeuw E, eds. Health Promotion and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2013:131-153.
  16. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):207-214. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061
  17. Conklin Α, Morris Ζ, Note Ε. Involving the Public in Healthcare Policy. An Update of the Research Evidence and Proposed Evaluation Framework. A Technical Report. Santa Monica; 2010.
  18. Lenaghan J. Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries. Health Policy. 1999;49(1-2):45-61. doi:10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00042-1
  19. Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J. Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009;91(3):219-228. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005
  20. Höglund AT, Winblad U, Arnetz B, Arnetz JE. Patient participation during hospitalization for myocardial infarction: perceptions among patients and personnel. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24(3):482-489. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00738.x
  21. Weingart SN, Zhu J, Chiappetta L, et al. Hospitalized patients' participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23(3):269-277. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzr002
  22. Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, Smith DM, Kerr EA. The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(4):243-252. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10905.x
  23. McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, et al. Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(1):50-62. doi:10.3322/caac.20093
  24. Holman H. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. BMJ. 2000;320(7234):526-527. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7234.526
  25. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259-267. doi:10.1093/heapro/15.3.259
  26. Hibbard J, Mahoney E, Stock R, Tusler M. Do Increases in Patient Activation Result in Improved Self-Management Behaviors? Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1443-1463. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00669.x
  27. Sullivan M. The new subjective medicine: taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(7):1595-1604. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00159-4
  28. Bieber C, Müller K, Blumenstiel K, et al. Long-term effects of a shared decision-making intervention on physician–patient interaction and outcome in fibromyalgia. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):357-366. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.003
  29. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43(1):5-22. doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00149-x
  30. van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ, Grit KJ. Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):73-85. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00567.x
  31. Raingruber B. The Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions with cancer patients: an integrative review of the literature (2006–2011). ISRN Nurs. 2011;2011:638218. doi:10.5402/2011/638218
  32. van Thiel G, Stolk P. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World. A Public Health Approach to Innovation. Update on 2004 Background Paper. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  33. INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2012.
  34. Viergever R, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:36.
  35. Wood B. Patient Power? The Politics of Patients’ Associations in Britain and America. 1st ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
  36. Harrison S, Barnes M, Mort M. Praise and damnation: mental health user groups and the construction of organisational legitimacy. Public Policy Adm. 1997;12(2):4-16. doi:10.1177/095207679701200202
  37. Baggott R, Allsop J, Jones K. Speaking for Patients and Carers: Health Consumer Groups and the Policy Process. 1st ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
  38. Allsop J, Jones K, Baggott R. Health consumer groups in the UK: a new social movement? Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26(6):737-756. doi:10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00416.x
  39. Cancer - European Commission. Eceuropaeu. 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/health/major_chronic_diseases/diseases/cancer/index_en.htm.  Accessed October 26, 2016.
  40. Jemal A, Center M, DeSantis C, Ward E. Global Patterns of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(8):1893-1907. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0437
  41. Hendren S, Chin N, Fisher S, et al. Patients’ barriers to receipt of cancer care, and factors associated with needing more assistance from a patient navigator. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011;103(8):701-710. doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30409-0
  42. Jemal A, Ward E, Wu X, Martin H, McLaughlin C, Thun M. Geographic patterns of prostate cancer mortality and variations in access to medical care in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(3):590-595. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0522
  43. Souliotis K. The involvement of Patient Groups in health policy decision making: Pilot Study in Greece. Paper presented at: II Therapeutic Coalition Conference; 2015.
  44. Thouvenin D. French Medical Malpractice Compensation since the Act of March 4, 2002: Liability Rules Combined with Indemnification Rules and Correlated with Several Kinds of Proceedings. Drexel Law Review. 2011;4(165):165-197.
  45. Ferré FB, Valerio L, Longhi S, et al. Italy: Health System Review. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2014.
  46. Baggott R, Forster R. Health consumer and patients' organizations in Europe: towards a comparative analysis. Health Expect. 2008;11(1):85-94. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00472.x
  47. Barbot J. How to build an “active” patient? The work of AIDS associations in France. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(3):538-551. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.025
  48. WHO. Exploring Patient Participation in Reducing Health-Care-Related Safety Risks. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
  49. Council of Europe. Recommendation on Patient Safety, Including the Prevention and Control of Healthcare Associated Infections. Brussels, Belgium: Council of the European Union; 2009.
  50. WHO. Cross-Border Health Care in the European Union Mapping and Analysing Practices and Policies. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2011.
  51. O'Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2(CD001431). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431
  52. Eliasoph H, Monaghan B, Beaudoin R, et al. "We are all in this together": integrated health service plans in Ontario. HCQ. 2007;10(3):82-87. doi:10.12927/hcq.2007.18938
  53. Wiseman V, Mooney G, Berry G, Tang K. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(5):1001-1012. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00091-6
  54. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, et al. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(15):1-148. doi:10.3310/hta8150
  55. Legare F, Stacey D, Forest PG. Shared decision-making in Canada: update, challenges and where next! Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):213-221. doi:10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.024
  56. Goold SD, Biddle AK, Klipp G, Hall CN, Danis M. Choosing health plans all together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005;30(4):563-602. doi:10.1215/03616878-30-4-563
  57. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(1):56-66. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011
  58. Vega A. Healthcare democracy and society's challenges with regard to medicines (French). Soins. 2014;784:31-34.
  59. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Patient and Public Involvement Policy. United Kingdom: NICE; 2016.
  60. European Union. European Charter of Patients’ Rights. European Commission; 2002.
  61. World Health Organization. The Ljubljana Charter on Reforming Health Care in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO; 1996.
  62. Council of Europe. The Development of Structures for Citizen and Patient Participation in the Decision-Making Process Affecting Health Care. Strasbourg; 2000.
  • Receive Date: 26 October 2016
  • Revise Date: 31 January 2017
  • Accept Date: 27 March 2017
  • First Publish Date: 01 January 2018