Examining the Potential Role of a Supervised Injection Facility in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, to Avert HIV among People Who Inject Drugs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

Abstract

Background
Research predicting the public health and fiscal impact of Supervised Injection Facilities (SIFs), across different cities in Canada, has reported positive results on the reduction of HIV cases among People Who Inject Drugs (PWID). Most of the existing studies have focused on the outcomes of Insite, located in the Vancouver Downtown Eastside (DTES). Previous attention has not been afforded to other affected areas of Canada. The current study seeks to address this deficiency by assessing the cost-effectiveness of opening a SIF in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
 
Methods
We used two different mathematical models commonly used in the literature, including sensitivity analyses, to estimate the number of HIV infections averted due to the establishment of a SIF in the city of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
 
Results
Based on cumulative cost-effectiveness results, SIF establishment is cost-effective. The benefit to cost ratio was conservatively estimated to be 1.35 for the first two potential facilities. The study relied on 34% and 14% needle sharing rates for sensitivity analyses. The result for both sensitivity analyses and the base line estimates indicated positive prospects for the establishment of a SIF in Saskatoon.
 
Conclusion
The opening of a SIF in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan is financially prudent in the reduction of tax payers’ expenses and averting HIV infection rates among PWID.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Jozaghi E, Andresen MA. Should North America’s first and only supervised injection facility (InSite) be expanded in British Columbia, Canada? Harm Reduct J 2013; 10: 1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-10-1
  2. Lemstra M, Rogers M, Thompson A, Moraros J, Buckingham R. Risk indicators associated with injection drug use in the Aboriginal population. AIDS Care 2012; 24: 1416-24. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.650678
  3. Lemstra M, Rogers M, Thompson A, Moraros J, Buckingham R. Risk indicators of depressive symptomatology among injection drug users and increased HIV risk behaviour. Can J Psychiatry 2011; 56: 358-65.
  4. Pinkerton SD. How many HIV infections are prevented by Vancouver’s Canada supervised injection facility? Int J Drug Policy 2011; 22: 179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.03.003
  5. Challacombe L. The epidemiology of HIV in people who inject drugs in Canada. CATIE 2014. Available from: http://www.catie.ca/fact-sheets/epidemiology/injection-drug-use-and-hiv-canada
  6. Holtgrave DR, Pinkerton SD, Jones TS, Lurie P, Vlahov D. Cost and cost effectiveness of increasing access to sterile syringes and needles as an HIV prevention intervention in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998; 18: 133-8. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199802001-00022
  7. Jozaghi E. “A little heaven in hell”: The role of a supervised injection facility in transforming place. Urban Geogr 2012; 33: 1144-62. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.8.1144
  8. Jozaghi E. The role of drug users’ advocacy group in changing the dynamics of life in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada. J Subst Use 2014; 19: 213-8. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2013.775608
  9. Ti L, Kerr T, Wood E, Werb D, DeBeck K, Graham D, et al. Drug Situation in Vancouver. Vancouver: Urban Health Research Initiative of the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS; 2013.
  10. Jozaghi E, Reid AA, Andresen MA, Juneau A. A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of proposed supervised injection facilities in Ottawa, Canada. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2014; 9: 31. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-31
  11. Jozaghi E. Morality versus the scientific evidence: The story behind Bill C-2. J Subst Use 2015; forthcoming. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2014.987837
  12. Wood E, Tyndall MW, Stoltz J, Small W, Zhang R, O’Connell J. Safer injection education for HIV prevention within a medical supervised safer injection facility. Int J Drug Policy 2005; 16: 281-4.  doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.07.004
  13. DeBeck K, Kerr T, Bird L, Zhang R, Marsh D, Tyndall M, et al. Injection drug use cessation and use of North America’s first medically supervised safer injecting facility. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 113: 172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.07.023
  14. Marshall BD, Milloy MJ, Wood E, Montaner JS, Kerr T. Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America’s first medically supervised safer injection facility: A retrospective population-based study. Lancet 2011; 377: 1429-37. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62353-7
  15. Pinkerton SD. Is Vancouver Canada’s supervised injection facility cost-saving? Addiction 2010; 105: 1429-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02977.x
  16. Des Jarlais DC, Arasteh K, Hagan H. Commentary: Evaluating Vancouver’s supervised injection facility: Data and dollars, symbols and ethics. CMAJ 2008; 179: 1105-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081678
  17. Andresen MA, Boyd NT. A cost–benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of Vancouver’s supervised injection facility. Int J Drug Policy 2010; 21: 70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.03.004
  18. Bayoumi AM, Zaric GS. The cost-effectiveness of Vancouver’s supervised injection facility. CMAJ, 2008; 179: 1143-51. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080808
  19. Jozaghi E, Reid AA, Andresen MA.  A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of proposed supervised injection facilities in Montreal, Canada. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2013; 8: 25. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-25
  20. Jozaghi E. A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of an unsanctioned supervised smoking facility in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada. Harm Reduct J 2014;  11: 30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-30
  21. Laurence Thompson Strategic Consulting. A review of needle exchange program in Saskatchewan: Final report, 2008. [cited July 29, 2013]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/needle-exchange-review-report
  22. HIV Strategy for Saskatchewan. A comprehensive provincial strategy of HIV in Saskatchewan and to improve the quality of life for HIV positive people. 2014. Saskatoon: Saskatchewan Ministry of Health, Population Health Branch; 2014. Available from: http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/hiv-strategy-2010-2014
  23. Strathdee S, Patrick D, Currie S, Cornelisse P, Rekart M, Montaner J, et al. Needle exchange is not enough: lessons from the Vancouver injecting use study. AIDS 1997; 11: F59-65. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199708000-00001
  24. Fisher D, Fenaughty A, Cagle H, Wells R. Needle exchange and injection drug use frequency: a random controlled trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 33: 199-205. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200306010-00014
  25. Jacobs P, Calder P, Taylor M, Houston S, Saunders LD, Albert T. Cost effectiveness of streetworks’ needle exchange program of Edmonton. Can J Public Health 1999; 90: 168-71.
  26. Andresen MA, Jozaghi E. The point of diminishing returns: an examination of expanding Vancouver’s Insite. Urban Stud 2012; 49: 3531-44. doi: 10.1177/0042098012443865
  27. Kaplan EH, O’Keefe E. Let the needles do the talking! Evaluating the New Haven needle exchange. Interfaces 1993; 23: 7-26. doi: 10.1287/inte.23.1.7
  28. Laufer FN. Cost-effectiveness of syringe exchange as an HIV prevention strategy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2001; 28: 273-8. doi: 10.1097/00042560-200111010-00012
  29. MSIC Evaluation Committee. Final report on the evaluation of the Sydney Medically supervised injection centre. Sydney, Australia; 2003. [cited October 23, 2013]. Available from: http://www.indro-online.de/sydneyfinalreport.pdf        
  30. Kerr T, Tyndall M, Li K, Montaner J, Wood E. Safer injection facility use and syringe sharing in injection drug users. Lancet 2005; 366: 316-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66475-6
  31. Bravo MJ, Royuela L, Fuente DL, Brugal MT, Barrio G, Salvany D. Use of supervised injection facilities and injection risk behaviours among young drug injectors. Addiction 2009; 104: 614-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02474.x
  32. McClean ME. Vancouver drug use epidemiology-2001: Vancouver and BC site report for the Canadian community epidemiology network on drug use. Vancouver, BC: Vancouver-Richmond Health Board; 2002.
  33. Lurie P, Drucker E. An opportunity lost: HIV infections associated with lack of a national needle-exchange programme in the USA. Lancet 1997; 349: 604-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)05439-6
  34. Tyndall MW, Kerr T, Zhang R, King E, Montaner JG, Wood E. Attendance, drug use patterns, and referrals made from North America’s first supervised injection facility. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 83: 193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.011
  35. Gold M, Gafni A, Nelligan P, Millson P. Needle exchange programs: An economic evaluation of a local experience. CMAJ 1997; 157: 255-62. 
  36. Laurie ML, Green KL. Health risks and opportunities for harm reduction among injection-drug-using clients of Saskatoon’s needle exchange program.  Can J Public Health 2000; 91: 350-2.
  37. Warren J. Fewer needles found during annual cleanup. The Star Phoenix, 2010. [cited August 05, 2013]. Available from: http://www2.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/third_page/story.html?id=033c537d-d7e1-4950-b2ec-ce6a015c798c&p=1
  38. Schackman BR, Gebo KA, Walensky RP, Losina E, Muccio T, Sax PE, et al. The lifetime cost of current human immunodeficiency virus care in the United States. Med Care 2006; 44: 990-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228021.89490.2a
  39. Health Canada. Vancouver's INSITE service and other Supervised injection sites: What has been learned from research? Final report of the Expert Advisory Committee. 2008. [cited July 9, 2013]. Available from:  http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/pubs/_sites-lieux/insite/index-eng.php
  40. Iskandar S, Kamal R, De Jong CA. Psychiatric comorbidity in injecting drug users in Asia and Africa. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012; 25: 213. doi: 10.1097/yco.0b013e3283523d66
  41. De Bruin P, Gibson S, Trischuk H. Saskatoon Health Region HIV Prevention, Treatment & Support Strategy. Saskatoon: Saskatoon Health Region; 2010
  42. Lang K, El-Aneed A, Berenbaum S, Dell CA, Wright J, McKay ZT. Qualitative assessment of crisis services among persons using injection drugs in the city of Saskatoon. J Subst Use 2013; 18: 3-11. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2011.606350
  43. Lang K, Neil J, Wright J, Dell CA, Berenbaum S, El-Aneed A. Qualitative investigation of barriers to accessing care by people who inject drugs in Saskatoon, Canada: perspectives of service providers. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2013; 8: 35. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-35
  44. Laurie ML, Green KL. Health risks and opportunities for harm reduction among injection-drug-using clients of Saskatoon’s needle exchange program.  Can J Public Health 2000; 91: 350-2.
  45. Kerr T, Wood E, Palepu A, Wilson D, Schechter MT, Tyndall MW. Responding to an explosive HIV epidemic driven by frequent cocaine injection: Is there a role for safe injection facilities? J Drug Issues 2003; 33: 579-608. doi: 10.1177/002204260303300303
  46. Wood E, Kerr T, Small W, Li K, Marsh DC, Montaner JS, et al. Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injection facility for drug users. CMAJ 2004; 171: 731-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040774
  47. Kerr T, Tyndall M, Li K, Montaner J, Wood E. Safer injection facility use and syringe sharing in injection drug users. Lancet 2005; 366: 316-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66475-6
  48. Small W, Wood E, Lioyd-Smith E, Tyndall M, Kerr T. Accessing care for injection-related infections through a medically supervised injection facility: A Qualitative study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 98: 159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.014
  49. Wood E, Tyndall MW, Zhang R, Stoltz JA, Lai C, Montaner JS, et al. Attendance at supervised injecting facilities and use of detoxification services. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:  2512-4. doi: 10.1056/nejmc052939
  50. Kerr T, Small W, Moore D, Wood E. A micro-environmental intervention to reduce the harms associated with drug-related overdose: Evidence from the evaluation of Vancouver’s safer injection facility. Int J Drug Policy 2007; 18: 37-45.
  51. Kerr T, Wood E, Small D, Palepu A, Tyndall MW. Potential use of safer injecting facilities among injection drug users in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. CMAJ 2003; 169: 759-63.
  52. Semaan S, Fleming P, Worrell C, Stolp H, Baack B, Miller M. Potential role of safer injection facilities in reducing HIV and hepatitis C infections and overdose mortality in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 118: 100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.006
  53. Hyshka E, Bubela T, Wild TC. Prospects for scaling‐up supervised injection facilities in Canada: the role of evidence in legal and political decision‐making. Addiction 2013; 108: 468-76.
  54. Jozaghi E, Reid AA. A case study in transformation in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada by peer injection drug users. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 2014; 56: 563-94. doi: 10.3138/cjccj.2013.e30

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 17 November 2014
  • Revise Date: 24 March 2015
  • Accept Date: 25 March 2015
  • First Publish Date: 01 June 2015

Share

How to cite

Statistics