Implementation of a Health Policy Advisory Committee as a Knowledge Translation Platform: The Nigeria Experience

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria

2 Health Policy & Systems Research Project (Knowledge Translation Platform), Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria

3 National Agency for the Control of AIDS, Abuja, Nigeria

4 Department of Banking & Finance, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria

5 National Obstetrics Fistula Centre, Abakaliki, Nigeria

6 Department of Paediatrics, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria

Abstract

Background
In recent times, there has been a growing demand internationally for health policies to be based on reliable research evidence. Consequently, there is a need to strengthen institutions and mechanisms that can promote interactions among researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders who can influence the uptake of research findings. The Health Policy Advisory Committee (HPAC) is one of such mechanisms that can serve as an excellent forum for the interaction of policy-makers and researchers. Therefore, the need to have a long term mechanism that allows for periodic interactions between researchers and policy-makers within the existing government system necessitated our implementation of a newly established HPAC in Ebonyi State Nigeria, as a Knowledge Translation (KT) platform. The key study objective was to enhance the capacity of the HPAC and equip its members with the skills/competence required for the committee to effectively promote evidence informed policy-making and function as a KT platform.
 
Methods
A series of capacity building programmes and KT activities were undertaken including: i) Capacity building of the HPAC using Evidence-to-Policy Network (EVIPNet) SUPPORT tools; ii) Capacity enhancement mentorship programme of the HPAC through a three-month executive training programme on health policy/health systems and KT in Ebonyi State University Abakaliki; iii) Production of a policy brief on strategies to improve the performance of the Government’s Free Maternal and Child Health Care Programme in Ebonyi State Nigeria; and iv) Hosting of a multi-stakeholders policy dialogue based on the produced policy brief on the Government’s Free Maternal and Child Health Care Programme.
 
Results
The study findings indicated a noteworthy improvement in knowledge of evidence-to-policy link among the HPAC members; the elimination of mutual mistrust between policy-makers and researchers; and an increase in the awareness of importance of HPAC in the Ministry of Health (MoH).
 
Conclusion
Findings from this study suggest that a HPAC can function as a KT platform and can introduce a new dimension towards facilitating evidence-to-policy link into the operation of the MoH, and can serve as an excellent platform to bridge the gap between research and policy.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. Uneke CJ, Ezeoha AE, Ndukwe CD, Oyibo PG, Onwe F. Promotion of evidence-informed health policy-making in Nigeria: bridging the gap between researchers and policy-makers. Glob Public Health 2012; 7: 750-65. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2012.666255
    2. Uneke CJ, Ezeoha AE, Ndukwe CD, Oyibo PG, Onwe F. Development of health policy and systems research in Nigeria: lessons for developing countries’ evidence-based health policy making process and practice. Healthc Policy 2010; 6: 48-65. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2013.22749
    3. Campbell DM, Redman S, Jorm L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Rychetnik L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Aust New Zealand Health Policy2009;6: 21. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-6-21
    4. Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur RE. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00166-7
    5. Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M. The Utilization of Health Research in Policy-Making: Concepts, Examples and Methods of Assessment. Health Res Policy Syst 2003;1: 2.
    6. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7: 239-44. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432778
    7. Haines A, Kuruvilla S, Borchert M. Bridging the implementation gap between knowledge and action for health. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82: 724-31. 
    8. Jönsson K, Tomson G, Jönsson C, Kounnavong S, Wahlström R. Health systems research in Lao PDR: capacity development for getting research into policy and practice. Health Res Policy Syst 2007; 5: 11. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-5-11
    9. Young J. Research, Policy and practice: why developing countries are different. J Int Dev 2005; 17: 727-34.
    10. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR). Developing a CIHR framework to measure the impact of health research (cihr synthesis report). In: CIHR, editor. More about knowledge translation at CIHR. Ottawa: CIHR; 2005.
    11. Landry R,  Lyons R,  Amara N,  Warner G,  Ziam S, Halilem N,  et al. Knowledge Translation Planning Tools for Stroke Researchers. 2006. [cited 2014 August].  Available from: http://www.ahprc.dal.ca/pdf/kt/2006_KTP lanningTool.pdf
    12. Uneke CJ, Ezeoha A, Ndukwe CD, Oyibo PG, Onwe F, Igbinedion EB, et al. Individual and organisational capacity for evidence use in policy making in Nigeria: an exploratory study of the perceptions of Nigeria health policy makers. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2011; 7:  251-76.  doi: 10.1332/174426411x591744 
    13. Choi BC, Gupta A, Ward B. Good thinking: six ways to bridge the gap between scientists and policy makers. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2009; 63: 179-80. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.082636
    14. Ministry of Health Uganda (MoHU). Health Sector Strategic & Investment Plan. Promoting People’s Health to Enhance Socio-economic Development 2010/11 – 2014/15 [internet].[cited 2014 August].  Available from: http://www.kampala.cooperazione.esteri.it/            utlkampala/Download/HSSIPFinal.pdf
    15. Hutton G . Case study of a ‘successful’ sector-wide approach: the Uganda health sector SWAp. A lessons learned paper established in the frame of the SDC-STI SWAp Mandate 2003-4. [cited 2014 August].  Available from: http://www.sti.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Pdfs/swap/swap351.pdf
    16. New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000 (NZPHDA).  Public Health Advisory Committee (PHAC). 2001. [cited 2015 January 10]. Available from:  http://www.nhc.health.govt.nz/sites/www.nhc.health.govt.nz/            files/documents/publications/NHCAdvisordec2001.pdf  
    17. City of Minneapolis Public Health Advisory Committee (CMPHAC). Public Health Advisory Committee (PHAC).  2011. [cited 2015 January 10]. Available from:  http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/boards/general/         boards-and-commissions_public-health-advisory-committee
    18. Lane County, Oregon (LCO). Public Health Advisory Committee (PHAC). 2011.  [cited 2015 January 10]. Available from: http://www.co.lane.or.us/Departments/BCC/            AdvisoryCommittees/Pages/PublicHealthAdvisoryCommittee.aspx
    19. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem (MJDIS). Health Policy Advisory Committee. 2011.  [cited 2015 January 10]. Available from:   http://brookdale.jdc.org.il/?CategoryID=162&ArticleID=164
    20. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policy-making (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policy-making? Health Res Policy Syst 2009; 7 Suppl 1: S1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S1
    21. Moynihan R, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Paulsen E. Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier – Report from the Kunnskapssenteret (Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services), No. 1-2008. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2008.
    22. Salchev P,  Hristov N, Georgieva L. Evidence Based Policy – Practical Approaches. The Bulgarian National Health Strategy 2007-2012. [cited 2014 August].  Available from:  http://biecoll.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/volltexte/2009/2120/pdf/Dokument2_10.pdf
    23. Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
    24. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 2008;13: 544-59.
    25. World Health Organization (WHO). Implementation research toolkit. Geneva: WHO;  2014.
    26. Uneke CJ, Aulakh BK,  Ezeoha AE, Ndukwe CD, Oyibo PG, Onwe F. Bridging the divide between research and policy in Nigeria: The role of health policy advisory committee.  J  Pub Health Policy 2012;33: 423-29. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2012.30
    27. Uneke CJ, Ndukwe CD, Ezeoha AA, Urochukwu HC, Ezeonu CT. Improving maternal and child healthcare programme using community-participatory interventions in Ebonyi State Nigeria.  Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3: 283-7.  doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.91
    28. Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policy-making (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed Policy-making. Health Res Policy Syst  2009; 7: S13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-s1-s13
    29. Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policy-making (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policy-making. Health Res Policy Syst  2009; 7: S14. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-s1-s13
    30. Giorgi, A.  Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method.In: Giorgi A, editor. Phenomenology and  psychological research: essays.  Pittsburgh, Pa: Duquesne University Press; 1985.
    31. Albert MA, Fretheim A, Maïga D. Factors influencing the utilization of research findings by health policy-makers in a developing country: the selection of Mali's essential medicines.  Health Res Pol Syst 2007; 5: 2.
    32. Uneke CJ, Ndukwe CD, Ezeoha AE,  Uro-Chukwu HC, Ezeonu CT. Improving Maternal and Child Healthcare Programme Using Community-Participatory Interventions in Ebonyi State Nigeria. Int  J Health Pol Mgt  2014; 3: 283-7.
    33. Dawad S, Veenstra N. Comparative health systems research in a context of HIV/AIDS: lessons from a multi-country study in South Africa, Tanzania and Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst  2007;  5: 13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-5-13
    34. World Health Organization (WHO). Report: consultation on strengthening health research capacity in the pacific. Manila, Philippines: Regional Office for the Western Pacific, WHO; 2008.
    35. Varkevisser CM, Mwaluko GM, Le Grand A. Research in action: the training approach of the Joint Health Systems Research Project for the Southern African Region. Health Policy Plan 2001; 16: 281-91. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.3.281
    36. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR). Sound choices: enhancing capacity for evidence-informed health policy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
    37. Choi BC, McQueen DV, Rootman I. Bridging the gap between scientists and decision makers. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2003; 57: 918. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.12.918
    38. Choi BC, Pang T, Lin V, Puska P, Sherman G, Goddard M, et al. Can scientists and policy makers work together? J Epidemiol Comm Health 2005; 59: 632-7.
    39. International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). The RM Knowledge Translation Toolkit: A Resource for Researchers. IDRC & SDC; 2008.
    40. Bennett G, Jessani N. The knowledge translation toolkit: bridging the know-do gap: a resource for researchers/International Development Research Centre, Ottawa [internet]. 2011. [cited 2014 August].  Available from:   http://web.idrc.ca/openebooks/508-3/
    41. US  General  Service  Administration  (USGSA).  Performance Measurement  [internet].  [cited  2014  August].  Available  from: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104522
    42. National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability (NACHD). Terms of reference [internet]. 2011. [cited 2014 August].  Available from:   http://www.nhc.health.govt.nz/about-us/terms-reference
    43. Lichiello P. The Turning Point Guidebook for Performance Measurement. Turning Point National Program Office,  University of Washington. 1999. [cited 2014 August].  Available from:  http://www.turningpointprogram.org/toolkit/pdf/pmc_guide.pdf

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 September 2014
  • Revise Date: 30 January 2015
  • Accept Date: 30 January 2015
  • First Publish Date: 01 March 2015

Share

How to cite

Statistics