Food Taxes: A New Holy Grail?

Document Type : Perspective

Author

Artevelde University College, University of Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

In an effort to reduce the growing prevalence of overweight and obesity, food taxes have been introduced in several European countries, the so-called ‘obesitax’. As yet little evidence is at hand, policy measures are being taken to counterweight the consumption of unhealthy food or the increasing diet-related diseases. Several questions need to be discussed, starting from a general perspective: can food taxes become an appropriate and just policy measure to reduce overweight and obesity and therefore increase consumer’s health? The implementation of an effective and fair food tax is an exercise riddled with uncertainty. Not only is there a need for evidence on the health and economic impact of food taxes, we also have to think about a conceptual and ethical discussion concerning the balance between health imperatives and public health on the one hand, and social and ethical standards on the other hand.

Highlights

 

 

Watch the Video Summary here. 

 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Full Text

"Listen to PodCast Summary"

References

1. Lundberg O, Lahelma E. Nordic health inequalities in the European context. In: Kautto M, Fritzell J, Hvinden B, Kvist J, Uusitalo H, eds. Nordic Welfare States in the European Context. Routledge: London & New York; 2001. p. 42–65. doi: 10.1177/09589287020120010602
2. WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO: Geneva; 2000. doi: 10.1017/s0021932003245508
3. White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity. Solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation. Report to the president. Washington, 2010. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2010.9980  
4. European Commission. Solidarity In Health: Reducing Health Inequalities in the EU. SEC(2009) 1396, Brussels, 2009.
5. Alemanno A, Carreño I. Fat taxes in the EU: between fiscal austerity and the fight against obesity. European Journal of Risk Regulation 2011; 4: 571–6.
6. Caraher M, Cowburn G. Taxing food: implications for public health nutrition. Public Health Nut 2005; 8: 1242–9. doi: 10.1079/phn2005755
7. Cantillon B, Van Lancker W. Solidarity and reciprocity in the social investment state: what can be learned from the case of Flemish school allowances and truancy? J Soc Policy 2012; 41: 657–75. doi: 10.1017/s0047279412000359
8. Brownell KD, Kersh R, Ludwig DS, Post RC, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, et al. Personal Responsibility And Obesity: A Constructive Approach to a Controversial Issue. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29: 379–87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0739
9. Andreyeva T, Long MW, Brownell KD. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on price elasticity of demand for food. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 216–22. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2008.151415 
10. Epstein LH, Dearing KK, Paluch RA, Roemmich JN, Cho D. Price and maternal obesity influence purchasing of low- and high-energy-dense foods. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 914–22.
11. French SA. Pricing effects on food choices. J Nutr 2003; 133: 841–3.
12. Herman DR, Harrison GG, Afifi AA, Jenks E. Effect of a targeted subsidy on intake of fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 98–105. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2005.079418
13. Steenhuis IHM, Waterlander WE, de Mul A. Consumer food choices: the role of pricing and pricing strategies. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 2220–6. doi: 10.1017/s1368980011001637
14. Jensen JD, Smed S. Cost-effective design of economic instruments in nutrition policy. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007; 4: 10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-10  
15. Mytton O, Gray A, Rayner M, Rutter H. Could targeted food taxes improve health? J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61: 689–94. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.047746  
16. Faulkner GE, Grootendorst P, Nguyen VH, Andreyeva T, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Auld MC, et al. Economic instruments for obesity prevention: results of a scoping review and modified Delphi survey. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 109. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-109  
17. Thow AM, Jan S, Leeder S, Swinburn B. The effect of fiscal policy on diet, obesity and chronic disease: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 609–14. doi: 10.2471/blt.09.070987  
18. Grunert KG, Wills JM. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 2007; 15: 385–99. doi: 10.1007/s10389-007-0101-9
19. Nnoaham KE, Sacks G, Rayner M, Mytton O, Gray A. Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int J Epidemiol 2009; 38: 1324–33. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp214
20. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, Corrao M, Jacob B. Reducing the burden of smoking world-wide: effectiveness of interventions and their coverage. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006; 25: 597–609. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944511  
21. Irala-Estévez JD, Groth M, Johansson L, Oltersdorf U, Prättälä R, Martínez-González MA. A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 706–14. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601080
22. Have MT, van der Heide A, Mackenbach JP, de Beaufort ID. An ethical framework for the prevention of overweight and obesity: a tool for thinking through a programme’s ethical aspects. Eur J Public Health 2013; 23: 299–305. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks052
23. Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M. Obesity Metaphors: How Beliefs about the Causes of Obesity Affect Support for Public Policy. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 7–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00546.x
24. Oliver JE, Lee T. Public Opinion and the Politics of Obesity in America. J Health Polit Policy Law 2005; 30: 923–54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-5-923  

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 June 2013
  • Revise Date: 09 July 2013
  • Accept Date: 11 July 2013
  • First Publish Date: 11 July 2013

Share

How to cite

Statistics