Standing on the Shoulder of Power, Representation and Relational Trust; A Response to Recent Commentaries

Document Type : Correspondence

Authors

1 School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada

2 Faculty of Health Science, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

3 Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada

Keywords

Full Text

We appreciate the commentaries by colleagues1-3 to our article Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study4 in which we describe a co-designed deliberative dialogue process. The dialogue was meant to partner with tenants, service providers, and municipal decision-makers to generate solutions for health-related issues associated with living in the income-geared apartment building. ...(Read more...)

References

  1. Banner D, Plamondon K, Oelke ND. Grappling with the inclusion of patients and the public in consensus building: a commentary on inclusion, safety, and accessibility: Comment on "Evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue: a single case study.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13(1):1-4. doi:34172/ijhpm.2024.7715
  2. Boydell KM. Enhancing multiple ways of knowing: Comment on "Evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue: a single case study.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12(1):7776. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7776
  3. Jiménez-Pernett J. How to account for asymmetries in deliberative dialogues: Comment on "Evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue: a single case study.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12(1):7701. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7701
  4. Scurr T, Ganann R, Sibbald SL, Valaitis R, Kothari A. Evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue: a single case study. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(11):2638-2650. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.6588
  5. Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Abelson J, Dobbins M, Carter N. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(11):1938-1945. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.016
  6. Brydges M, Rooks R, Coxson K, Pirrie M, Agarwal G, Dunn J. A pilot program to address tenants’ complex social, psychological, and medical needs in social housing: lessons learned. Cities Health. 2022;6(6):1034-1038. doi:1080/23748834.2022.2115961
  7. Krips H. Power and resistance. Philos Soc Sci. 1990;20(2):170-182. doi:1177/004839319002000202
  8. Rolfe DE, Ramsden VR, Banner D, Graham ID. Using qualitative health research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:49. doi:1186/s40900-018-0129-8
  9. Hunt J, Littlewood DT. Developing Participatory Consultation: A Review of Learning from Four Experimental Dialogue Processes. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University; 2003.
  10. Martin-Storey A, Temcheff CE, Ruttle PL, et al. Perception of neighborhood disorder and health service usage in a Canadian sample. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43(2):162-172. doi:1007/s12160-011-9310-0
  11. Wathen CN, Sibbald SL, Jack SM, Macmillan HL. Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women. Implement Sci. 2011;6:102. doi:1186/1748-5908-6-102

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 14 July 2024
  • First Publish Date: 17 July 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics