The Meso-Level in Quality Improvement: Perspectives From a Maternal-Neonatal Health Partnership in South Africa

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

School of Public Health & SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Background 
Sustained implementation of facility-level quality improvement (QI) processes such as Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, requires enabling meso-level environments and supportive macrolevel policies and strategies. Although this is well recognised, there is little systematic empirical evidence on roles and capacities, especially at the immediate meso-level of the system, that sustain QI strategies at the frontline.
 
Methods 
In this paper we report on qualitative research to characterize the elements of a quality and outcome-oriented meso-level, focused on sub/district health systems, conducted within a multi-level initiative to improve maternal-newborn health (MNH) in three provinces of South Africa. Drawing on the embedded experience and tacit knowledge of core project partners, obtained through in-depth interviews (39) and project documentation, we analysed thematically the roles, capacities and systems required at the meso-level for sustained QI, and experiences with strengthening the meso-level.
 
Results 
Meso-level QI roles identified included establishing and supporting quality improvement systems and strengthening delivery networks. We propose three elements of system capacity as enabling these meso-level roles: 1) leadership stability and capacity, 2) the presence of formal mechanisms to coordinate service delivery processes at sub-district and district levels (including governance, referral and outreach systems), and 3) responsive district support systems (including quality oriented human resource, information and emergency medical services management), embedded within supportive relational eco-systems and appropriate decision-space. While respondents reported successes with system strengthening, overall, the meso-level was regarded as poorly oriented to and even disabling of quality at the frontline.
 
Conclusion 
We argue for a more explicit orientation to quality and outcomes as an essential district and sub-district function (which we refer to as meso-level stewardship), requiring appropriate structures, processes and capacities.

Keywords

References

  1. Semrau KEA, Hirschhorn LR, Marx Delaney M, et al. Outcomes of a coaching-based WHO safe childbirth checklist program in India. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(24):2313-2324. doi:1056/NEJMoa1701075
  2. Sampath B, Rakover J, Baldoza K, Mate K, Lenoci-Edwards J, Barker P. Whole System Quality: A Unified Approach to Building Responsive, Resilient Health Care Systems. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2021.
  3. The Last Mile: Addressing the Unfinished Agenda in Health and Nutrition. Pretoria: UNICEF; 2017.
  4. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196-e1252. doi:1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3
  5. Ramani S, Sivakami M, Gilson L. How context affects implementation of the primary health care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 3):e001381. doi:1136/bmjgh-2018-001381
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Handbook for National Quality Policy and Strategy: A Practical Approach for Developing Policy and Strategy to Improve Quality of Care. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  7. Oboirien K, Harris B, Goudge J, Eyles J. Implementation of district-based clinical specialist teams in South Africa: analysing a new role in a transforming system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):600. doi:1186/s12913-018-3377-2
  8. Kinney MV, George AS, Rhoda NR, Pattinson RC, Bergh AM. From pre-implementation to institutionalization: lessons from sustaining a perinatal audit program in South Africa. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023;11(2):e2200213. doi:9745/ghsp-d-22-00213
  9. Odendaal W, Goga A, Chetty T, et al. Early reflections on Mphatlalatsane, a maternal and neonatal quality improvement initiative implemented during COVID-19 in South Africa. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10(5):e2200022. doi:9745/ghsp-d-22-00022
  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Introducing the WHO Quality Toolkit: Supplemental Overview. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
  11. World Health Organization (WHO). Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  12. Larson E, Gage AD, Mbaruku GM, Mbatia R, Haneuse S, Kruk ME. Effect of a maternal and newborn health system quality improvement project on the use of facilities for childbirth: a cluster-randomised study in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2019;24(5):636-646. doi:1111/tmi.13220
  13. Waiswa P, Manzi F, Mbaruku G, et al. Effects of the EQUIP quasi-experimental study testing a collaborative quality improvement approach for maternal and newborn health care in Tanzania and Uganda. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):89. doi:1186/s13012-017-0604-x
  14. English M, Nzinga J, Irimu G, et al. Programme theory and linked intervention strategy for large-scale change to improve hospital care in a low and middle-income country - a study pre-protocol. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:265. doi:12688/wellcomeopenres.16379.2
  15. Gage AD, Gotsadze T, Seid E, Mutasa R, Friedman J. The influence of continuous quality improvement on healthcare quality: a mixed-methods study from Zimbabwe. Soc Sci Med. 2022;298:114831. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2022.114831
  16. Coles E, Anderson J, Maxwell M, et al. The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):94. doi:1186/s13643-020-01344-3
  17. Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):189. doi:1186/s12913-019-4015-3
  18. Zasada M, Yates M, Ayers N, et al. Exploring the macro-level, meso-level and micro-level barriers and facilitators to the provision of good quality early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) care in England and Wales. RMD Open. 2021;7(3):e001616. doi:1136/rmdopen-2021-001616
  19. Gray CS. Overcoming political fragmentation: the potential of meso-level mechanisms: Comment on "Integration or fragmentation of health care? Examining policies and politics in a Belgian case study". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12(1):7075. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.7075
  20. McGivern G, Nzinga J, English M. 'Pastoral practices' for quality improvement in a Kenyan clinical network. Soc Sci Med. 2017;195:115-122. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.031
  21. Sequeira D'Mello B, Bwile P, Carmone AE, et al. Averting maternal death and disability in an urban network of care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a descriptive case study. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(2):e1834303. doi:1080/23288604.2020.1834303
  22. Schneider H, George A, Mukinda F, Tabana H. district governance and improved maternal, neonatal and child health in South Africa: pathways of change. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):e1669943. doi:1080/23288604.2019.1669943
  23. Schneider H, van der Merwe M, Marutla B, Cupido J, Kauchali S. The whole is more than the sum of the parts: establishing an enabling health system environment for reducing acute child malnutrition in a rural South African district. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(6):430-439. doi:1093/heapol/czz060
  24. Barker PM, Reid A, Schall MW. A framework for scaling up health interventions: lessons from large-scale improvement initiatives in Africa. Implement Sci. 2016;11:12. doi:1186/s13012-016-0374-x
  25. Zondi T, Day C. Measuring national health insurance towards universal health coverage in South Africa. In: Moeti T, Padarath A, eds. South African Health Review. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2019.
  26. Langlois EV, McKenzie A, Schneider H, Mecaskey JW. Measures to strengthen primary health-care systems in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(11):781-791. doi:2471/blt.20.252742
  27. National Health Insurance Bill. Republic of South Africa; 2019.
  28. Schneider H, Mianda S. District and Sub-District Stewardship of Quality and Health Outcomes: Roles, Systems and Strategies (Briefing Document). Cape Town: University of the Western Cape; 2022.
  29. Dixon-Woods M, Pronovost PJ. Patient safety and the problem of many hands. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(7):485-488. doi:1136/bmjqs-2016-005232
  30. National Department of Health. National Referral Policy for SA Health Services and Implementation Guidelines. Pretoria: National Department of Health; 2020.
  31. Pattinson RC, Bergh AM, Ameh C, et al. Reducing maternal deaths by skills-and-drills training in managing obstetric emergencies: a before-and-after observational study. S Afr Med J. 2019;109(4):241-245. doi:7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i4.13578
  32. Witter S, van der Merwe M, Twine R, et al. Opening decision spaces: a case study on the opportunities and constraints in the public health sector of Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Res Sq [Preprint]. February 16, 2021. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr283915.
  33. Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ. Uncovering middle managers' role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7:28. doi:1186/1748-5908-7-28
  34. English M, Nzinga J, Oliwa J, et al. Improving facility-based care: eliciting tacit knowledge to advance intervention design. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(8):e009410. doi:1136/bmjgh-2022-009410
  35. Rossiter M, Verma J, Denis JL, Samis S, Wedge R, Power C. Governing collaborative healthcare improvement: lessons from an Atlantic Canadian case. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(12):691-694. doi:15171/ijhpm.2017.60
  36. Sabot K, Marchant T, Spicer N, et al. Contextual factors in maternal and newborn health evaluation: a protocol applied in Nigeria, India and Ethiopia. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018;15:2. doi:1186/s12982-018-0071-0
  37. Pfadenhauer LM. Conceptualizing context and intervention as a system in implementation science: learning from complexity theory: Comment on "Stakeholder perspectives of attributes and features of context relevant to knowledge translation in health settings: a multi-country analysis". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(8):1570-1573. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.147
  38. Mukinda FK, Van Belle S, George A, Schneider H. The crowded space of local accountability for maternal, newborn and child health: a case study of the South African health system. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(3):279-290. doi:1093/heapol/czz162
  39. Muthathi IS, Levin J, Rispel LC. Decision space and participation of primary healthcare facility managers in the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance programme in two South African provinces. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(3):302-312. doi:1093/heapol/czz166

 

  1. Engelbrecht B, Gilson L. Governance, Leadership and Management. In: Matsoso MP, Chikte U, Makubalo L, et al, eds. The South African Health Reforms 2015-2020. South Africa: Trackstar Trading 111 (PTY) LTD; 2022

 

  1. Schneider H, Mianda S, Odendaal W, Chetty T. Managing local health system interdependencies: referral and outreach systems for maternal and newborn health in three South African districts. Systems. 2023;11(9):462. doi:3390/systems11090462
  2. van der Merwe M, D'Ambruoso L, Witter S, et al. Collective reflections on the first cycle of a collaborative learning platform to strengthen rural primary healthcare in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):66. doi:1186/s12961-021-00716-y

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 20 February 2024
  • Accept Date: 07 May 2024
  • First Publish Date: 08 May 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics