How Primary Healthcare Sector is Organized at the Territorial Level in France? A Typology of Territorial Structuring

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Research Center in Epidemiology and Population Health, Primary Care and Prevention Team, Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Villejuif, France

2 Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Public Health, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, GHU Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Garches, France

Abstract

Background 
Most the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries are currently facing the challenges of the health transition, the aging of their populations and the increase in chronic diseases. Effective and comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) services are considered essential for establishing an equitable, and costeffective healthcare system. Developing care coordination and, on a broader scale, care integration, is a guarantee of quality healthcare delivery. The development of healthcare systems at the meso-level supports this ambition and results in a process of territorial structuring of PHC. In France, the Health Territorial and Professional Communities (HTPC) constitute meso-level organizations in which healthcare professionals (HCPs) from the same territory gather. We conducted a study to determine, in a qualitative step, the key elements of the territorial structuring of PHC in France and, then, to develop, in a quantitative step, a typology of this structuring.
 
Methods 
A sequential-exploratory mixed-method study with a qualitative step using a multiple case approach and a quantitative step as a hierarchical clustering on principal components (HCPC) from a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA).
 
Results 
A total of 7 territories were qualitatively explored. Territorial structuring appears to depend on: past collaborations at the micro-level, meso-level coordination among HCPs and multiprofessional structures, diversity of independent professionals, demographic dynamics attracting young professionals, and public health investment through local health contracts (LHCs). The typology identifies 4 clusters of mainland French territories based on their level of structuring: under or unstructured (38.6%), with potential for structuring (34.7%), in the way for structuring (25.3%) and already structured territories (1.4%).
 
Conclusion 
Interest in territorial structuring aligns with challenges in meso-level healthcare organization and the need for integrated care. Typologies of territorial structuring should be used to understand its impact on access, care quality, and medical resources.

Keywords

References

  1. Meslé F, Vallin J. [From epidemiological transition to health transition]. Med Trop (Mars). 2007;67(6):545-551. [French].
  2. Health at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2023_7a7afb35-en. Accessed February 14, 2024.
  3. Zonneveld N, Raab J, Minkman MM. Towards a values framework for integrated health services: an international Delphi study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):224. doi:1186/s12913-020-5008-y
  4. Kringos DS, Boerma W, van der Zee J, Groenewegen P. Europe’s strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):686-694. doi:1377/hlthaff.2012.1242
  5. Breton M, Wankah P, Guillette M, et al. Multiple perspectives analysis of the implementation of an integrated care model for older adults in Quebec. Int J Integr Care. 2019;19(4):6. doi:5334/ijic.4634
  6. Smith J, Parkinson S, Harshfield A, Sidhu M. Early Evidence of the Development of Primary Care Networks in England: A Rapid Evaluation Study. Southampton, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022.
  7. Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e010. doi:5334/ijic.886
  8. Hwang W, Chang J, Laclair M, Paz H. Effects of integrated delivery system on cost and quality. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(5):e175-e184.
  9. Poku MK, Kagan CM, Yehia B. Moving from care coordination to care integration. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1906-1909. doi:1007/s11606-019-05029-z
  10. Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, et al. Association of integrated team-based care with health care quality, utilization, and cost. JAMA. 2016;316(8):826-834. doi:1001/jama.2016.11232
  11. Bourgueil Y, Marek A, Mousquès J. Three Models of Primary Care Organisation in Europe, Canada, Australia and New-Zealand. No 141. Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics; 2009:1-6.
  12. Borkan J, Eaton CB, Novillo-Ortiz D, Rivero Corte P, Jadad AR. Renewing primary care: lessons learned from the Spanish health care system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(8):1432-1441. doi:1377/hlthaff.2010.0023
  13. Pacileo G, Morando V, Banks H, et al. DM management in HIV patients: the adoption of population health management to transform the chronic management of HIV. Eur J Public Health. 2022;32(6):942-947. doi:1093/eurpub/ckac120
  14. Cook LL, Golonka RP, Cook CM, et al. Association between continuity and access in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open. 2020; 8(4):E722-E730. doi:9778/cmajo.20200014
  15. Rocks S, Fazel M, Tsiachristas A. Variation in spend on young mental health across Clinical Commissioning Groups in England: a cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e030011. doi:1136/bmjopen-2019-030011
  16. Stanciu MA, Law RJ, Myres P, et al. The development of the Primary Care Clusters Multidimensional Assessment (PCCMA): a mixed-methods study. Health Policy. 2020;124(2):152-163.  doi:1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.004
  17. Kaufman BG, Spivack BS, Stearns SC, Song PH, O’Brien EC. Impact of accountable care organizations on utilization, care, and outcomes: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2019;76(3):255-290. doi:1177/1077558717745916
  18. Coldefy M, Lucas-Gabrielli V. Les territoires de santé: des approches régionales variées de ce nouvel espace de planification. Prat Organ Soins. 2008;41(1):73-80. doi:3917/pos.411.0073
  19. Mc Hugh S, O’Mullane M, Perry IJ, Bradley C. Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e003217. doi:1136/bmjopen-2013-003217
  20. Threapleton DE, Chung RY, Wong SY, et al. Integrated care for older populations and its implementation facilitators and barriers: a rapid scoping review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(3):327-334. doi:1093/intqhc/mzx041
  21. Leslie M, Fadaak R, Pinto N. Doing primary care integration: a qualitative study of meso-level collaborative practices. BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):149. doi:1186/s12875-023-02104-7
  22. OECD, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. France: Country Health Profile 2023, State of Health in the EU. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:1787/07c48f9f-en
  23. Hassenteufel P, Schweyer FX, Gerlinger T, Reiter R. Les “déserts médicaux” comme leviers de la réorganisation des soins primaires, une comparaison entre la France et l’Allemagne. Rev Fr Aff Soc. 2020(1):33-56. doi:3917/rfas.201.0033
  24. Sanchez MA, Sanchez S, Bouazzi L, Peillard L, Ohl-Hurtaud A, Quantin C. Does the implementation of pay-for-performance indicators improve the quality of healthcare? First results in France. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1063806. doi:3389/fpubh.2023.1063806
  25. Leicher C. CPTS et territoire. Regards. 2020(56):81-92. doi:3917/regar.056.0081
  26. Rist S, Rogez R. Les CPTS: de l’ambition politique à la réalité territoriale. Les Tribunes de la Santé. 2020(63):51-55. doi:3917/seve1.063.0051
  27. Ferru M, Omer J. Les communautés professionnelles territoriales de santé: une relecture du dispositif en termes de proximités. Innovations. 2021;65(2):21-48. doi:3917/inno.pr2.0109
  28. Eliot E, Lucas-Gabrielli V, Mangeney C. Territorialisation Sanitaire et Décentralisation: État Des Lieux et Enjeux à Partir Du Cas Français. Revue Francophone sur la Santé et les Territoires; 2017. doi:4000/rfst.577
  29. Le Bodo Y, Fonteneau R, Diallo D, et al. Measuring local strategies to address the determinants of population health: development and application of the CLoterreS instrument. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2022;70(6):286-298. doi:1016/j.respe.2022.09.073
  30. Loncle P. La mise en œuvre des politiques de santé publique au niveau local: “l’animation territoriale en santé en Bretagne.” Sci Soc Sante. 2009; 27(1):5-31. doi:3917/sss.271.0005
  31. Schapman-Segalie S, Lombrail P. Dossier - Collectivités territoriales et santé - Les champs d’intervention des collectivités territoriales - Etat et collectivités territoriales: la contractualisation et les contrats locaux de santé. ADSP - Actualité et dossier en santé publique. 2013(82):44-46.
  32. Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):3-20. doi:1177/1525822x05282260
  33. Arrêté du 1er octobre 2021 modifiant l’arrêté du 13 novembre 2017 relatif à la méthodologie applicable à la profession de médecin pour la détermination des zones prévues au 1° de l’article L. 1434-4 du code de la santé publique. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000044194193. Accessed February 14, 2024.
  34. Yin RK. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1209-1224.
  35. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237-246. doi:1177/1098214005283748
  36. Josse J. Principal Component Methods - Hierarchical Clustering - Partitional Clustering: Why Would We Need to Choose for Visualizing Data? Computer Science, Mathematics; 2010. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15851062.
  37. Argüelles M, Benavides C, Fernández I. A new approach to the identification of regional clusters: hierarchical clustering on principal components. Appl Econ. 2014;46(21):2511-2519. doi:1080/00036846.2014.904491
  38. Greenacre M, Blasius J. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. CRC Press; 2006.
  39. Hoyle RH, Duvall JL. Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Kaplan D, ed. The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications; 2014. doi:4135/9781412986311
  40. Cuadros DF, Li J, Musuka G, Awad SF. Spatial epidemiology of diabetes: methods and insights. World J Diabetes. 2021;12(7):1042-1056. doi:4239/wjd.v12.i7.1042
  41. Duarte L, Teodoro AC, Lobo M, Viana J, Pinheiro V, Freitas A. An open-source GIS application for spatial assessment of health care quality indicators. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. 2021;10(4):264. doi:3390/ijgi10040264
  42. Roquette R, Painho M, Nunes B. Spatial epidemiology of cancer: a review of data sources, methods and risk factors. Geospat Health. 2017; 12(1):504. doi:4081/gh.2017.504
  43. Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Farmer J, Inada H, Kajii E. Geographic distribution of primary care physicians in Japan and Britain. Health Place. 2010; 16(1):164-166. doi:1016/j.healthplace.2009.07.005
  44. Senn N, Breton M, Ebert ST, Lamoureux-Lamarche C, Lévesque JF. Assessing primary care organization and performance: literature synthesis and proposition of a consolidated framework. Health Policy. 2021;125(2):160-167. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.004
  45. Blanco-Cazeaux I. Location dynamics of general practitioners in France. SSM Popul Health. 2022;19:101240. doi:1016/j.ssmph.2022.101240
  46. Moyal A, Fournier C. Après Ma santé 2022, encore de multiples défis à relever pour les soins primaires en France. Les Tribunes de la Santé. 2022;71(1):33-45. doi:3917/seve1.071.0033
  47. Boniol M, Kunjumen T, Nair TS, Siyam A, Campbell J, Diallo K. The global health workforce stock and distribution in 2020 and 2030: a threat to equity and ‘universal’ health coverage? BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(6):e009316. doi:1136/bmjgh-2022-009316
  48. Haldane V, Zhang Z, Abbas RF, et al. National primary care responses to COVID-19: a rapid review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(12):e041622. doi:1136/bmjopen-2020-041622
  49. Saint-Lary O, Gautier S, Le Breton J, et al. How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a French national observational survey. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e042119. doi:1136/bmjopen-2020-042119
  50. Orvik A, Axelsson R. Organizational health in health organizations: towards a conceptualization. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012;26(4):796-802. doi:1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00996.x
  51. Fournier C, Clerc P. The Construction of a Territorial Organization of Primary Care Stakeholders Facing the COVID-19 Epidemic: Contributions of a Case Study at the Canton Level. Revue Francophone sur la Santé et les Territoires; 2021. doi:4000/rfst.874
  52. Clerc P, Certain MH. Territorial innovation in Les Mureaux. Rev Fr Aff Soc. 2020(1):263-280. doi:3917/rfas.201.0263
  53. Gautier S, Bourgueil Y, Dugué F. Les conditions de l’action collective dans le cadre des communautés professionnelles territoriales de santé: une approche qualitative exploratoire. https://athena.u-pec.fr/primo-explore/search?query=any,exact,997723028604611&vid=upec. Published 2019. Accessed February 14, 2024.
  54. Nuako A, Liu J, Pham G, et al. Quantifying rural disparity in healthcare utilization in the United States: analysis of a large midwestern healthcare system. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263718. doi:1371/journal.pone.0263718
  55. Babinet O, Isnard Bagnis C. 3. Déserts médicaux géographiques: les collectivités territoriales ont-elles trouvé la martingale? In: Les déserts médicaux en question(s). Débats Santé Social. Presses de l’EHESP; 2021:43-52. https://www.cairn.info/les-deserts-medicaux-en-questions--9782810907595-p-43.htm.
  56. de Fontgalland C, Rouzaud-Cornabas M. Identifying professional and territorial health communities by analyzing healthcare spatial realities. Sante Publique. 2020;32(2-3):239-246. doi:3917/spub.202.0239
  57. Schweyer FX, Fiquet L, Fleuret S, et al. Cinq équipes de soins primaires face à la pandémie. Analyse des mobilisations territoriales. Revue Francophone sur la Santé et les Territoires; 2021. doi:4000/rfst.976
  58. Lamarche PA, Beaulieu MD, Pineault R, et al. Sur la voie du changement: pistes à suivre pour restructurer les services de santé de première ligne au Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé; 2003.
  59. Rodríguez Duarte MA. Typologie organisationnelle des équipes interprofessionnelles de soins de santé primaires au Québec et leur relation avec les caractéristiques populationnelles [dissertation]. Université de Montréal; 2023.
  60. Fournier C, Michel L, Morize N, et al. Primary Care Practice in Response to the COVID-19 Epidemic. Between Weakening and Strengthening of the Dynamics of Local Coordination. https://www.irdes.fr/english/2022/qes-260-primary-care-practice-in-response-to-the-covid-19-epidemic.html. Published July 2021.
  61. Barlet M, Coldefy M, Collin C, Lucas-Gabrielli V. L’Accessibilité potentielle localisée (APL): une nouvelle mesure de l’accessibilité aux médecins généralistes libéraux. IRDES - Questions d’économie de la santé. No. 174. 2012
  62. Desborough J, Dykgraaf SH, Phillips C, et al. Lessons for the global primary care response to COVID-19: a rapid review of evidence from past epidemics. Fam Pract. 2021;38(6):811-825. doi:1093/fampra/cmaa142
  63. Bouchez T, Gautier S, Le Breton J, Bourgueil Y, Ramond-Roquin A. The challenge for general practitioners to keep in touch with vulnerable patients during the COVID-19 lockdown: an observational study in France. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):82. doi:1186/s12875-022-01694-y
  64. Ramond-Roquin A, Gautier S, Le Breton J, Bourgueil Y, Bouchez T. French general practitioners’ adaptations for patients with suspected COVID-19 in May 2020. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):1896. doi:3390/ijerph20031896
  65. Golobic M, Marot N. Territorial impact assessment: integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34(3):163-173. doi:1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.009
  66. Chevillard G, Mousquès J. Les maisons de santé attirent-elles les jeunes médecins généralistes dans les zones sous-dotées en offre de soins? IRDES - Questions d’économie de la santé. 2020.
  67. Rechel B. How to Enhance the Integration of Primary Care and Public Health? Approaches, Facilitating Factors and Policy Options. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2020.
  68. Shahzad M, Upshur R, Donnelly P, et al. A population-based approach to integrated healthcare delivery: a scoping review of clinical care and public health collaboration. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):708. doi:1186/s12889-019-7002-z
  69. Gautier S, Ray M, Rousseau A, et al. [Primary healthcare and COVID-19 in France: contributions of a research network including practitioners and researchers]. Sante Publique. 2022;33(6):923-934. doi:3917/spub.216.0923

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 August 2023
  • Revise Date: 24 March 2024
  • Accept Date: 07 May 2024
  • First Publish Date: 08 May 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics