Next Steps for Elevating Health on Trade and Investment Policy Agendas; Comment on “How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Abstract

Despite intergovernmental calls for greater policy coherence to tackle rising non-communicable diseases (NCDs), there has been a striking lack of coherence internationally and nationally between trade and health sectors. In this commentary, I explore the arguments by Lenucha and Thow in relation to barriers for greater coherence for NCDs, apply them to regional trade agreements, and point to next steps in research and advocacy for greater attention to health and NCD prevention in government trade agendas.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. NCD Morbidity and mortality. World Health Organization website. https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/mortality_morbidity/en/. Published 2019.
  2. Battams S, Townsend B. Power asymmetries, policy incoherence and noncommunicable disease control - a qualitative study of policy actor views. Crit Public Health. 2019;29(5):596-609. doi:10.1080/09581596.2018.1492093
  3. Lencucha R, Thow AM. How neoliberalism is shaping the supply of unhealthy commodities and what this means for NCD prevention. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(9):514-520. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.56
  4. Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, et al. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):670-679. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62089-3
  5. Kickbusch I, Allen L, Franz C. The commercial determinants of health. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(12):e895-e896. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30217-0
  6. Rushton S, Williams OD. Frames, paradigms and power: global health policy-making under neoliberalism. Glob Soc. 2012;26(2):147-167. doi:10.1080/13600826.2012.656266
  7. Townsend B, Schram A, Baum F, Labonté R, Friel S. How does policy framing enable or constrain inclusion of social determinants of health and health equity on trade policy agendas? Crit Public Health. 2018:1-12. doi:10.1080/09581596.2018.1509059
  8. Barlow P, McKee M, Basu S, Stuckler D. The health impact of trade and investment agreements: a quantitative systematic review and network co-citation analysis. Global Health. 2017;13(1):13. doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0240-x
  9. Ranald P. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: reaching behind the border, challenging democracy. Econ Labour Relat Rev. 2015;26(2):241-260. doi:10.1177/1035304615580721
  10. Friel S, Baker P, Thow AM, Gleeson D, Townsend B, Schram A. An exposé of the realpolitik of trade negotiations: implications for population nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(16):3083-3091. doi:10.1017/S1368980019001642
  11. O'Brien P. Australia's double standard on Thailand's alcohol warning labels. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32(1):5-10. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00485.x
  12. Schram A, Labonté R, Baker P, Friel S, Reeves A, Stuckler D. The role of trade and investment liberalization in the sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages market: a natural experiment contrasting Vietnam and the Philippines. Global Health. 2015;11(1):41.
  13. Earthworker Energy Manufacturing Cooperative. About. https://earthworkerenergy.coop/.  Published 2019.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 9, Issue 7
July 2020
Pages 312-314

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 26 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 24 November 2019
  • Accept Date: 25 November 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 July 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics