Why We Must Talk About Institutional Corruption to Understand Wrongdoing in the Health Sector; Comment on “We Need to Talk About Corruption in Health Systems”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Abstract

While various forms of corruption are common in many health systems around the world, defining wrongdoing in terms of legality and the use of public office for private gain obstructs our understanding of its nature and intractability. To address this, I suggest, we must not only break the silence about the extent of wrongdoing in the health sector, but also talk differently about corruption in general, and corruption in healthcare specifically. I propose adopting the notion of institutional corruption (IC) developed by Thompson and Lessig, as divergence from the original purpose of the institution, which may not be illegal but may nevertheless cause harm to people who depend on it by creating perverse dependencies and compelling individuals to act against its core purpose. Such work is much needed to provide in-depth accounts of how external political and legislative pressures enable corruption in healthcare systems. I also argue for bringing together insights from various research domains and levels of analysis to capture why and how corruption becomes systemic, deeply embedded, and intractable.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Underkuffler LS. Captured by evil: The idea of corruption in law. Duke Law School Faculty Scholarship Series. 2005; 23. https://lsr.nellco.org/duke_fs/23.
  2. Hutchinson E, Balabanova D, McKee M. We need to talk about corruption in health systems. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(4):191-194. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.123
  3. Chattopadhyay S. Corruption in healthcare and medicine: Why should physicians and bioethicists care and what should they do? Ind J Med Ethics. 2013;10(3):153-159. doi:10.20529/IJME.2013.049
  4. Rose-Ackerman S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  5. Rose-Ackerman S, Palifka BJ. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2016.
  6. Transparency International. Diagnosing Corruption in Healthcare. London: Transparency International UK; 2016.
  7. Vian T. Review of corruption in the health sector: Theory, methods and interventions. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(2):83-94. doi:10.1093/heapol/czm048
  8. Tanzi V, Davoodi H. Corruption, public investment and growth. IMF Working Paper 97/139. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 1997.
  9. Campos JE, Pradahan P. The Many Faces of Corruption: Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2007.
  10. Graycar A, Prenzler T. Understanding and Preventing Corruption. London: Palgrave; 2013.
  11. Transparency International. The Anti-Corruption Plain Language Guide. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International; 2009.
  12. Haller D, Shore C, eds. Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press; 2005.
  13. Thompson D. Theories of institutional corruption. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2019;21:495-513. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-120117-110316
  14. Thompson D. Ethics in Congress: From Individual to Institutional Corruption. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1995.
  15. Angell M. The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It. New York, NY: Random House; 2004.
  16. Rodwin MA. Conflicts of interest, institutional corruption, and pharma: An agenda for reform. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;30:511-522. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00683.x
  17. Kassirer J. The corrupting influence of money in medicine. In: Transparency International, ed. Global Corruption Report 2006, Special Focus on Corruption and Health. London: Pluto Press; 2006.
  18. Von Maravic P, Reichard C. New Public Management and corruption: International Public Management Network (IPMN) dialogue and analysis. Int Public Manag Rev. 2003;4(1):84-129.
  19. Della Porta D, Mény Y, eds. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Cassell; 1997.
  20. Fleming P, Zyglidopoulos S. Rationalization, overcompensation and the escalation of corruption in organizations. J Bus Ethics. 2009;84(1):65-73. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9685-4
  21. Warren DE. Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28(4):622-632. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10899440
  22. Smith-Crowe K, Warren DE. The emotion-evoked collective corruption model: The role of emotion in the spread of corruption within organizations. Organ Sci. 2014;25:1154-1171. doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0896
  23. Lessig L. Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress – And a Plan to Stop It. New York, NY: Twelve Books; 2011.
  24. Light DW. Strengthening the theory of institutional corruptions: Broadening, clarifying, and measuring. Working Paper No. 2, Edmond J Safra Center for Ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard University; 2013.
  25. Lange D. A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Acad Manag Rev. 2008;33(3):710-729. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.32465742
  26. Pinto J, Leanna CR, Pil KF. Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Acad Manag Rev. 2008;33(3):685-709. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.32465726
  27. United Nations Development Programme. Institutional Arrangements to Combat Corruption: A Comparative Study. Bangkok, Thailand: UNDP Regional Center in Bangkok; 2005.
  28. Ashforth B, Gioia DA, Robinson SL, Trevino L. Re-viewing institutional corruption. Acad Manag Rev. 2008;33(3):670-684. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.32465714
  29. Fotaki M. Counteracting institutional corruption in diverse organizational and cultural settings. Project Report, Harvard University: Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics; 2015.
  30. Fotaki, M. Can consumer choice replace trust in the National Health Service in England? Towards developing an affective psychosocial conception of trust in health care. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(8):1276-1294. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12170
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 9, Issue 5
May 2020
Pages 206-208

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 23 October 2019
  • Accept Date: 23 October 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 May 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics