The Why, Who, What, How, and When of Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organizations: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Document Type : Correspondence

Authors

1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

2 Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA

3 Center for Bioethics and Humanities and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA

Keywords

Main Subjects

Full Text

We are grateful for the insightful comments received in response to our systematic review of metrics and evaluation tools for patient, public, consumer, and community (P2C2) engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making.1... (Read more...)

References

  1. Dukhanin V, Topazian R, DeCamp M. Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(10):889-903. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43
  2. Sofaer S. Using the taxonomy and the metrics: what to study when and why: Comment on "Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review."   Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;8(1):51-54. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.99
  3. Boivin A. From craft to reflective art and science: Comment on "Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;8(2):124-127. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.108
  4. Rahimi SA, Vignon Zomahoun HT, Legare F. Patient engagement and its evaluation tools – current challenges and future directions: Comment on "Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review.". Int J Health Policy Manag 2019;8(6):378-380. doi:10.15171/IJHPM.2019.16
  5. Danis M. Delving into the details of evaluating public engagement initiatives: Comment on "Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review."  Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(4):247-249. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.126
  6. Berger Z. Metrics of patient, public, consumer, and community engagement in healthcare systems: how should we define engagement, what are we measuring, and does it matter for patient care? Comment on "Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making: a systematic review."  Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;8(1):49-50. doi:10.15171/IJHPM.2018.94
  7. DeCamp M, Sugarman J, Berkowitz SA. Meaningfully engaging patients in ACO decision making. Am J Accountable Care. 2015;3(2):30-33.
  8. DeCamp M, Dukhanin V, Hebert LC, Himmelrich S, Feeser S, Berkowitz SA. Patients’ views about patient engagement and representation in health care governance. J Healthc Manag; In Press.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 8, Issue 9
September 2019
Pages 573-574

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 May 2019
  • Revise Date: 26 May 2019
  • Accept Date: 26 May 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 September 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics