WHO FCTC as a Pioneering and Learning Instrument; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”
The World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) is a unique global health instrument, since it is in the health field the only instrument that is international law. After the 10 years of its existence an Independent Expert Group assessed the impact of the FCTC using all available data and visiting a number of countries interviewing different stakeholders. It is quite clear that the Treaty has acted as a strong catalyst and framework for national actions and that remarkable progress in global tobacco control can be seen. At the same time FCTC has moved tobacco control in countries from a pure health issue to a legal responsibility of the whole government, and on the international level created stronger interagency collaboration. The assessment also showed the many challenges. The spread of tobacco use, as well as of other risk lifestyles, is related to globalization. FCTC is a pioneering example of global action to counteract the negative social consequences of globalization. A convention is not an easy instrument, but the FCTC has undoubtedly sparked thinking and development of other stronger public health instruments and of needed governance structures.
Nikogosian H, Kickbusch I. The legal strength of international health instruments - What it brings to global health governance? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(12):683-685. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.122
World Health Organization. Preventing Chronic Diseases – A Vital Investment. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
Puska P, Ståhl T. Health in All Policies – the Finnish Initiative: background, principles and current issues. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:315-328. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103658
World Health Organization. Global Plan for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
Shafey O, Eriksen M, Ross H, Mackay J. The Tobacco Atlas. 3rd ed. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2009.
2016 global progress report of the implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Control Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
Chung-Hall J, Craig L, Gravely S, Fong GT. Impact of the WHO framework Convention on Tobacco Control on the Implementation and Effectiveness of Tobacco Control Measures: A Global Evidence Review. ITC Project. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo; 2016.
Gravely S, Giovino GA, Craig L, Commar A, D’Espaignet ET, Schotte K, Fong GT. Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention of Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study. Lancet. 2016;2:e166-174.
ILO. A fair globalization: Creating Opportunities for All. World Commission on the Social Dimensions of Globalization. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2004.
Puska, P. (2018). WHO FCTC as a Pioneering and Learning Instrument; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(1), 75-77. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.63
MLA
Pekka Puska. "WHO FCTC as a Pioneering and Learning Instrument; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”", International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7, 1, 2018, 75-77. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.63
HARVARD
Puska, P. (2018). 'WHO FCTC as a Pioneering and Learning Instrument; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”', International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(1), pp. 75-77. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.63
VANCOUVER
Puska, P. WHO FCTC as a Pioneering and Learning Instrument; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2018; 7(1): 75-77. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.63