Just Say No to the TPP: A Democratic Setback for American and Asian Public Health; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

2 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

3 School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

The article by Labonté, Schram, and Ruckert is a significant and timely analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) policy and the severe threats to public health that it implies for 12 Pacific Rim populations from the Americas and Asia (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States, and Vietnam). With careful and analytic precision the authors convincingly unearth many aspects of this piece of legislation that undermine the public health achievements of most countries involved in the TTP. Our comments complement their policy analysis with the aim of providing a positive heuristic tool to assist in the understanding of the TPP, and other upcoming treaties like the even more encompassing Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and in so doing motivate the public health community to oppose the implementation of the relevant provisions of the agreements. The aims of this commentary on the study of Labonté et al are to show that an understanding of the health effects of the TPP is incomplete without a political analysis of policy formation, and that realist methods can be useful to uncover the mechanisms underlying TPP’s political and policy processes.

Highlights

 

 

Watch the Video Summary here. 

 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Full Text

 

 

References

  1. Labonté R, Schram A, Ruckert A. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is it everything we feared for health? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(8):487-496. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41
  2. Muntaner C, Borrell C, Espelt A, et al. Politics or policies vs politics and policies: a comment on Lundberg. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(5):1396-1397. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp220
  3. Muntaner C, Sridharan S, Solar O, Benach J. Against unjust global distribution of power and money: the report of the WHO Commission on the social determinants of health: global inequality and the future of public health policy. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30(2):163-175. doi:10.1057/jphp.2009.15
  4. Shankardass K, Renahy E, Muntaner C, O’Campo P. Strengthening the implementation of Health in All Policies: a methodology for realist explanatory case studies. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(4):462-473. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu021
  5. Navarro V.  Attacking Democracy and Wellbeing. Anagrama; 2015.
  6. Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. Sage publications; 2006.
  7. Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  8. Chang HJ. Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2007.
  9. Amsden A. Escape From Empire: The Developing World’s Journey Through Heaven. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press; 2007.
  10. Wade R. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.
  11. Stuckler D, McKee M, Ebrahim S, Basu S. Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco. PLoS Med. 2012 26;9(6):e1001235. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001235
  12. Chomsky N. Who Rules the World? Macmillan; 2016.
  13. Stiglitz J. The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York: Norton; 2015.
  14. Stiglitz J. Making Globalization Work. Norton; 2007.
  15. Stiglitz J. The Euro and its Threat to the Future of Europe. Penguin Books; 2016.
  16. Steele SL, Gilmore AB, McKee M, Stuckler D. The role of public law-based litigation in tobacco companies’ strategies in high-income, FCTC ratifying countries, 2004–14. J Public Health. 2016;38(3):516-521. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv068
  17. Reckwitz A. Toward a theory of social practices a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5(2):243-263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
  18. O’Campo P, Dunn JR, eds. Rethinking Social Epidemiology: Towards a Science of Change. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
  19. Ng E, Muntaner C. A critical approach to macrosocial determinants of population health: engaging scientific realism and incorporating social conflict. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2014;1 (1):27-37. doi:10.1007/s40471-013-0002-0
  20. Muntaner C. Invited commentary: on the future of social epidemiology—a case for scientific realism. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):852-857. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt143
  21. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Routledge; 1975.
  22. Bhaskar R. Philosophy and scientific realism. In: A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Routledge; 2008.
  23. Hedström P, Ylikoski P. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Ann Rev Sociol. 2010;36(1):49-67. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
  24. Sayer A. Realism and Social Science. Sage; 2000.
  25. Molnar A, Renahy E, O’Campo P, Muntaner C, Freiler A, Shankardass K. Using win-win strategies to implement health in all policies: a cross-case analysis. PloS One. 2016;11(2):e0147003. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147003
  26. Molnar A, O’Campo P, Ng E, et al. Protocol: Realist synthesis of the impact of unemployment insurance policies on poverty and health. Eval Program Plann. 2015;48:1-9. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.002
  27. O’Campo P, Kirst M, Tsamis C, Chambers C, Ahmad F. Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):855-866. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.019
  28. Shahidi FV. Welfare capitalism in crisis: a qualitative comparative analysis of labour market policy responses to the Great Recession. J Soc Policy. 2015;44(4):659-686. doi:10.1017/s004727941500029x
  29. With time running out, Obama to make final push on Asia trade deal that Clinton opposes. Politics. The Washington Post. August 1, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with-time-running-out-obama-to-make-final-push-on-asia-trade-deal-that-clinton-opposes/2016/08/01/2213464c-57f3-11e6-9767-f6c947fd0cb8_story.html.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 August 2016
  • Revise Date: 06 November 2016
  • Accept Date: 31 October 2016
  • First Publish Date: 01 July 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics