Global Health as a Field of Power Relations: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Document Type : Correspondence

Author

Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

Actors working in global health often portray it as an enterprise grounded in principled concerns, advanced by individuals and organizations who draw on scientific evidence to pursue health equity. This portrait is incomplete. It is also a field of power relations—a social arena in which actors claim and draw on expertise and moral authority to gain influence and pursue career, organizational and national interests. A clear understanding of  how power operates in this field is necessary to ensure that it is used productively to serve the aims of health equity and improved population health. Responding to commentaries on an editorial published in this journal, I offer 3 ideas toward this end: (1) be skeptical of the global health rationality project—the effort to rescue the field from the alleged indignities of politics through the application of scientific methods; (2) analyze global health as a field of power relations, a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu; and (3) elevate the place of input legitimacy—inclusive deliberation, fair process and transparency—to address legitimacy and knowledge deficits in this field.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Shiffman J. Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(6):297-299. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.120
  2. Brown GW. Knowledge, politics and power in global health: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(2):111-113. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.20
  3. Bump JB. Your call could not be completed as dialed: why truth does not speak to power in global health: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.63
  4. Engebretsen E, Heggen K. Powerful concepts in global health: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(2):115-117. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.19
  5. Grépin KA. Power and priorities: the growing pains of global health: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(5):321-322. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.48
  6. Hanefeld J, Walt G. Knowledge and networks – key sources of power in global health: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(2):119-121. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.25
  7. Lee K. Revealing power in truth: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(4):257-259. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.42
  8. Levine RE. Power in global health agenda-setting: the role of private funding: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(5):315-317. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.51
  9. Rushton S. The politics of researching global health politics: Comment on “Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(5): 311-314. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.47
  10. Horton R. Offline: The love of power is the demon of men.  Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1912. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62253-4
  11. Stone DA. Policy Paradox and Political Reason.  Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co; 1988.
  12. Fischer F. Beyond the rationality project: Policy analysis and the postpositive challenge. Policy Stud J. 1989;17:941-951.
  13. Bourdieu P. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
  14. Pouliot V, Mérand F. Bourdieu’s concepts.  In: Adler-Nissen R, ed.  Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR.  London and New York: Routledge; 2013:24-44.
  15. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health.  Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1993-1995. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9
  16. Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O, Moon S.  From sovereignty to solidarity: A renewed concept of global health for an era of complex interdependence. Lancet. 2014;383:94-97.
  17. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, ed.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood; 1986:241-258.
  18. Peillon M. Bourdieu’s field and the sociology of welfare. Journal of Social Policy 1998;27:213-229.
  19. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness in private and public health insurance. In: Coulter A, Ham C, eds.  The global challenge of health care rationing. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000:89-106.
  20. Schmidt VA.  Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput.’  Political Studies 2013;61:2-22.
  21. Dahl RA. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition.  New Haven: Yale University Press; 1971.
  22. Chambers R. Whose Reality Counts?  Putting the First Last.  London: Intermediate Technology Publications; 1997.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 May 2015
  • Revise Date: 22 May 2015
  • Accept Date: 20 May 2015
  • First Publish Date: 01 July 2015

Share

How to cite

Statistics