Policies and Processes for Social Inclusion: Using EquiFrame and EquIPP for Policy Dialogue; Comment on “Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development”
1Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
2Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
3University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
4Centre for Social Research, Chancellor College, Zomba, Malawi
5Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, Sudan
The application of EquiFrame in the analysis of sexual and reproductive health policies by Ivanova et al to a new thematic area, their selection of only some of the Core Concepts of human rights in health service provision and the addition of new vulnerable groups relevant to the purpose of their analysis, are all very welcome developments. We also applaud their application of EquiFrame to policies in countries where it has not previously been used, along with their use of interviews with policy-makers to produce a deeper understanding of policy processes. We argue that clear justification for the inclusion of additional, or replacement of some exiting vulnerable groups within EquiFrame should be accompanied by clear definitions of such groups, along with the evidence-base that justifies their classification as a vulnerable or marginalised group. To illustrate the versatility of EquiFrame, we summarise a range of ways in which it has been used across a number of regions; including a brief Case Study of its use to develop the National Health Policy of Malawi. While EquiFrame focuses on policy content, we preview a new policy analysis tool – Equity and Inclusion in Policy Processes (EquIPP) – which assesses the extent of equity and inclusion in broader policy processes. Together, EquiFrame and EquIPP can be used to help governments and civil society ensure that policies are addressing the much stronger emphasis on social inclusion, now apparent in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Amin M, MacLachlan M, Mannan H, et al. EquiFrame: a framework for analysis of the inclusion of human rights and vulnerable groups in health policies. Health Hum Rights. 2011;13(2):1-20.
Mannan H, Amin M, MacLachlan M, Consortium E. The EquiFrame Manual: Dublin: The Global Health Press; 2011.
MacLachlan M, Amin M, Mannan H, et al. Inclusion and human rights in African health policies: Using EquiFrame for comparative and benchmarking analysis of 51 policies from Malawi, Sudan, South Africa and Namibia. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35864. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035864
Ivanova O, Dræbel T, Tellier S. Are sexual and reproductive health policies designed for all? vulnerable groups in policy documents of four European countries and their involvement in policy development. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(10):663-671. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148
Mannan H, MacLachlan M, McVeigh J, Consortium E. Core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups in the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap. 2012;6(3):159-177. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2012.05.005
Eide AH, Amin M, MacLachlan M, Mannan H, Schneider M. Addressing equitable health of vulnerable groups in international health documents. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap. 2013;7(3):153-162. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2013.04.004
Schneider M, Eide AH, Amin M, MacLachlan M, Mannan H. Inclusion of vulnerable groups in health policies: Regional policies on health priorities in Africa. African Journal of Disability. 2013;2(1):9. doi:10.4102/ajod.v2i1.40
Eide AH, Amin M, MacLachlan M, Mannan H, Schneider M. Human rights, social inclusion and health equity in international donors' policies. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development. 2013;23(4):24-40. doi:10.5463/dcid.v23i4.144
O’Dowd J, Mannan H, McVeigh J. India’s disability policy–analysis of core concepts of human rights. 2007;24(4):69-90. doi:10.5463/dcid.v24i4.277
O’Donnell R. An examination of the economic empowerment of people with disabilities in South Africa. Dublin: Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin; 2008.
Emms C. Analysis of disability inclusive development good practice. Melbourne: Nossal Instittue for Global Health, University of Melbourne; 2014.
Pratto F, Stewart AL, Zeineddine FB. When inequality fails: Power, group dominance, and societal change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 2013;1(1):132-160. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.97
MacLachlan M. Macropsychology, policy, and global health. American Psychologist. 2014;69(8):851.
MacLachlan M, Mji G, Chataika T, et al. Facilitating disability inclusion in poverty reduction processes: group consensus perspectives from disability stakeholders in Uganda, Malawi, Ethiopia, and Sierra Leone. Disability & the Global South. 2014;1(1):107-127.
Huss T, MacLachlan M. Equity and Inclusion in Policy Processes: A Framework to Support Inclusive Policy Development, Implementation and Evaluation. Dublin; 2016. [In Press]
Atkinson AB, Marlier E. Analysing and measuring social inclusion in a global context. New York: United Nations; 2010.
The Opera Framework: Assessing Compliance with the obligation to fulfill economic, social and cultural rights. New York, USA: Centre for Economic and Social Rigths; 2012.
Mendizabal E, Osborne D, Young J. Policy engagement: How civil society can be more effective. London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute; 2006.
Popay JE, Hernandez M, Johnston H, Mathieson J, Rispel L. Understanding and Tackling Social Exclusion: Final Report of the Social Exclusion Knowledge Network of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
Sykes – Kelleher A. Introducing UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab. Presented at: the workshop on Promoting Social Inclusion Through Public Policies in Malaysia, Putrajaya; Malaysia; 2015.
Ahmimed C, MacLachlan M, Mannan H. Policies & Processes for Social Inclusion: Volume I: Possibilities from South East Asia. Jakarta, Indonesia: UNESCO; 2014.