Diffusion of Innovation in Mental Health Policy Adoption: What Should We Ask about the Quality of Policy and the Role of Stakeholders in this Process?; Comment on “Cross-National Diffusion of Mental Health Policy”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Abstract

In his recent study, Gordon Shen analyses a pertinent question facing the global mental health research and practice community today; that of how and why mental health policy is or is not adopted by national governments. This study identifies becoming a World Health Organization (WHO) member nation, and being in regional proximity to countries which have adopted a mental health policy as supportive of mental health policy adoption, but no support for its hypothesis that country recipients of higher levels of aid would have adopted a mental health policy due to conditionalities imposed on aid recipients by donors. Asking further questions of each may help to understand more not only about how and why mental health policies may be adopted, but also about the relevance and quality of implementation of these policies and the role of specific actors in achieving adoption and implementation of high quality mental health policies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Shen GC. Cross-national diffusion of mental health policy. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3: 269–82. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.96
  2. Knapp M, Funk M, Curran C, Prince M, Grigg M, McDaid D. Economic barriers to better mental health practice and policy. Health Policy Plan 2006; 21: 157-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czl003
  3. Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Knapp M, Whiteford H. Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency.  Lancet 2007; 370: 878-89. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61239-2
  4. Saraceno B, van Ommeren M, Batniji R, Cohen A, Gureje O, Mahoney J, et al. Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries.  Lancet 2007; 370: 1164-74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61263-x
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020. Sixty-Sixth World Health Assembly. Resolution WHA66/8. World Health Organization; 2013.
  6. Faydi E, Funk M, Kleintjes S, Ofori-Atta A, Ssebunnya J, Mwanza J, et al. An assessment of mental health policy in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst 2011; 9: 17. 10.1186/1478-4505-9-17
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). Mental health policy, plans and programmes: WHO mental health policy and service guidance package - module 1 (update 2). Geneva: WHO; 2005.
  8. Flisher AJ, Lund C, Funk M, Banda M, Bhana A, Doku V, Green A. Mental health policy development and implementation in four African countries. J Health Psychol 2007; 12: 505-16. doi: 10.1177/1359105307076237
  9. World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Research Organization (WHO EMRO). Summary report of the intercountry meeting to scale-up action on mental health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Cairo, Egypt 15-17 September 2014.
  10. Ssebunnya J, Kigozi F, Ndyanabangi S. Developing a National Mental Health Policy: A Case Study from Uganda. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001319
  11. Mackenzie J. Global mental health from a policy perspective: a context analysis. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2014.
  12. Shiffman J, Okonofua FE. The state of political priority for safe motherhood in Nigeria. BJOG 2007; 114: 127-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01184.x
  13. The Mental Health Innovation Network (MHIN). Knowledge Exchange Strategy 2014-2017 [internet]. 2014 [cited 20 January 2015]. Available from: http://mhinnovation.net/resources/mhin-knowledge-exchange-strategy-2014-2017#.VMIplEesWAU
  14. De Silva M, Roland J; on behalf of the All Party Parliamentary Groups on Global Health and Mental Health. Mental Health for Sustainable Development.  MHIN; 2014.