Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy
771
777
EN
Ole F.
Norheim
0000-0002-5748-5956
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
ole.norheim@uib.no
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.60
<span class="fontstyle0">How can evidence from economic evaluations of the type the Disease Control Priorities project have synthesized be translated to better priority setting? This evidence provides insights into how investing in health, particularly though priority interventions and expanded access to health insurance and prepaid care, can not only save lives but also help alleviate poverty and provide financial risk protection. The article discusses some of the relevant factors needed to develop a Theory of Change for translating economic evidence to better priority setting within countries, and proposes some key strategic choices that are necessary to achieve the desired outputs and outcomes.</span> <br /><br />
Theory of Change,Priority Setting in Health,Economic Evaluation,Equity
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3509.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3509_7a3708fb41c718bda5d94f9621884827.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
The Qualitative Descriptive Approach in International Comparative Studies: Using Online Qualitative Surveys
778
781
EN
Brayan
V. Seixas
School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
brayanseixas@ucla.edu
Neale
Smith
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology &
Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
neale.smith@ubc.ca
Craig
Mitton
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology &
Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
craig.mitton@ubc.ca
10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142
<span class="fontstyle0">International comparative studies constitute a highly valuable contribution to public policy research. Analysing different policy designs offers not only a mean of knowing the phenomenon itself but also gives us insightful clues on how to improve existing practices. Although much of the work carried out in this realm relies on quantitative appraisal of the data contained in international databases or collected from institutional websites, countless topics may simply not be studied using this type of methodological design due to, for instance, the lack of reliable databases, sparse or diffuse sources of information, etc. Here then we discuss the use of the qualitative descriptive approach as a methodological tool to obtain data on how policies are structured. We propose the use of online qualitative surveys with key stakeholders from each relevant national context in order to retrieve the fundamental pieces of information on how a certain public policy is addressed there. Starting from Sandelowski’s seminal paper on qualitative descriptive studies, we conduct a theoretical reflection on the current methodological proposition. We argue that a researcher engaged in this endeavour acts like a composite-sketch artist collecting pieces of information from witnesses in order to draw a valid depiction of reality. Furthermore, we discuss the most relevant aspects involving sampling, data collection and data analysis in this context. Overall, this methodological design has a great potential for allowing researchers to expand the international analysis of public policies to topics hitherto little appraised from this perspective.</span>
Qualitative Description,Online Qualitative Survey,International Comparative Studies,Health Policy Analysis
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3445.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3445_7d90a7b17059d24a39f055ef14fe4484.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
The International Landscape of Medical Licensing Examinations: A Typology Derived From a Systematic Review
782
790
EN
Tristan
Price
Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research &
Assessment (CAMERA), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
tristan.price@plymouth.ac.uk
Nick
Lynn
Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research &
Assessment (CAMERA), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
therefusenik@gmail.com
Lee
Coombes
School
of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
coombesl2@cardiff.ac.uk
Martin
Roberts
Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research &
Assessment (CAMERA), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
martin.roberts@plymouth.ac.uk
Tom
Gale
Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research &
Assessment (CAMERA), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
thomas.gale@plymouth.ac.uk
Sam
Regan de Bere
Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research &
Assessment (CAMERA), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
samantha.regandebere@plymouth.ac.uk
Julian
Archer
Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research &
Assessment (CAMERA), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
julian.archer@plymouth.ac.uk
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.32
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">National licensing examinations (NLEs) are large-scale examinations usually taken by medical doctors close to the point of graduation from medical school. Where NLEs are used, success is usually required to obtain a license for full practice. Approaches to national licensing, and the evidence that supports their use, varies significantly across the globe. This paper aims to develop a typology of NLEs, based on candidacy, to explore the implications of different examination types for workforce planning.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">A systematic review of the published literature and medical licensing body websites, an electronic survey of all medical licensing bodies in highly developed nations, and a survey of medical regulators.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">The evidence gleaned through this systematic review highlights four approaches to NLEs: where graduating medical students wishing to practice in their national jurisdiction must pass a national licensing exam before they are granted a license to practice; where </span><span class="fontstyle0">all </span><span class="fontstyle0">prospective doctors, whether from the national jurisdiction or international medical graduates, are required to pass a national licensing exam in order to practice within that jurisdiction; where international medical graduates are required to pass a licensing exam if their qualifications are not acknowledged to be comparable with those students from the national jurisdiction; and where there are no NLEs in operation. This typology facilitates comparison across systems and highlights the implications of different licensing systems for workforce planning.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">The issue of national licensing cannot be viewed in isolation from workforce planning; future research on the efficacy of national licensing systems to drive up standards should be integrated with research on the implications of such systems for the mobility of doctors to cross borders.</span> <br /><br />
Assessment,National Licensing Examinations,Regulation,Workforce Planning
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3491.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3491_6580e3e9a5807b3a023e072e6478aaca.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Development and Content Validation of a Transcultural Instrument to Assess Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation in Healthcare Organizations: The OR4KT
791
797
EN
Marie-Pierre
Gagnon
0000000207825457
Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de
Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada
marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca
Randa
Attieh
Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de
Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada
randa.attieh.1@ulaval.ca
Sandra
Dunn
CHEO Research Institute,
Centre for Practice Changing Research Building, Ottawa, ON, Canada
sdunn@bornontario.ca
Gonzalo
Grandes
Primary
Care Research Unit of Bizkaia – Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao,
Spain
gonzalo.grandesodriozola@osakidetza.eus
Paola
Bully
Primary
Care Research Unit of Bizkaia – Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao,
Spain
paola.bullygaray@osakidetza.eus
Carole A
Estabrooks
Faculty of
Nursing and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB,
Canada
carole.estabrooks@ualberta.ca
France
Légaré
Department of Family Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC,
Canada
france.legare@fmed.ulaval.ca
Geneviève
Roch
Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de
Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada
genevieve.roch@fsi.ulaval.ca
Mathieu
Ouimet
Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de
Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada
mathieu.ouimet@pol.ulaval.ca
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.17
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Implementing effective interventions in healthcare requires organizations to be ready to support change. This study aimed to develop, adapt transculturally, and assess the content and face validity of the Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation (OR4KT) tool. The OR4KT was designed to measure the readiness of healthcare organizations to implement evidence-informed change across a variety of services.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Based on systematic reviews of the literature, a Delphi exercise, and expert consultation, we first generated an initial pool of items. Second, we developed and assessed content validity of the pilot OR4KT questionnaire in English. Third, we created French and Spanish versions using a sequential forward and backward translation approach, and transcultural adaptation by a consensus process. Finally, we conducted pilot studies in three contexts – the Basque country region (Spain), and the provinces of Québec and Ontario (Canada) – where 30 experts assessed the face validity of the three versions of OR4KT.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">We selected 59 items, grouped in 6 dimensions (organizational climate, context, change content, leadership, organizational support, and motivation) for the final English version of OR4KT. Translation and transcultural adaptation did not identify any content or language problems. Our findings indicate that the English, French and Spanish versions of OR4KT are linguistically equivalents and have high face validity. Only minor revisions to the wording of some items were recommended.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">The OR4KT holds promise as a measure of readiness for knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare organizations. The validity and reliability of the three versions of the OR4KT will be assessed in real-life contexts of implementation of evidence-based changes in healthcare.</span>
Healthcare Organizations,Readiness for Change,Knowledge Translation,Instrument Development,Transcultural Validation
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3474.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3474_35f3121b9f8eae9de43490bbe63c61bf.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Out-of-Pocket Payments, Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Poverty Among Households in Nigeria 2010
798
806
EN
Bolaji
Samson Aregbeshola
0000-0001-9944-2543
Department of Community Health & Primary Care, College of Medicine,
University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
bolajiaregbeshola74@gmail.com
Samina
Mohsin Khan
Department of Public Health Sciences,
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
mominsmahnoor@gmail.com
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.19
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">There is high reliance on out-of-pocket (OOP) health payments as a means of financing health system in Nigeria. OOP health payments can make households face catastrophe and become impoverished. The study aims to examine the financial burden of OOP health payments among households in Nigeria.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Secondary data from the Harmonized Nigeria Living Standard Survey (HNLSS) of 2009/2010 was utilized to assess the catastrophic and impoverishing effects of OOP health payments on households in Nigeria. Data analysis was carried out using ADePT 6.0 and STATA 12.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">We found that a total of 16.4% of households incurred catastrophic health payments at 10% threshold of total consumption expenditure while 13.7% of households incurred catastrophic health payments at 40% threshold of nonfood expenditure. Using the $1.25 a day poverty line, poverty headcount was 97.9% gross of health payments. OOP health payments led to a 0.8% rise in poverty headcount and this means that about 1.3 million Nigerians are being pushed below the poverty line. Better-off households were more likely to incur catastrophic health payments than poor households.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Our study shows the urgency with which policy makers need to increase public healthcare funding and provide social health protection plan against informal OOP health payments in order to provide financial risk protection which is currently absent among high percentage of households in Nigeria.</span>
Out-of-Pocket Payments,Catastrophic Health Expenditure,Poverty,Financial Risk Protection,Universal Health Coverage
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3477.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3477_b5b398530ef2584ba4a91df0301cdcc3.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups
807
817
EN
Susanne
Hagen
0000-0003-3392-160X
Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of
Southeast Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
susanne.hagen@usn.no
Kjell
Ivar Øvergård
0000-0002-4029-4344
Department of Maritime Operations,
University College of Southeast Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
kjell.oevergaard@usn.no
Marit
Helgesen
Institute for
Urban and Regional Research, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo,
Norway
marit.k.helgesen@hiof.no
Elisabeth
Fosse
0000-0002-6038-5059
Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of
Bergen, Bergen, Norway
elisabeth.fosse@uib.no
Steffen
Torp
Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of
Southeast Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
steffen.torp@usn.no
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.22
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Norway is internationally known today for its political and socio-economic prioritization of equity. The 2012 Public Health Act (PHA) aimed to further equity in the domain of health by addressing the social gradient in health. The PHA’s main policy measures were (1) delegation to the municipal level of responsibility for identifying and targeting underserved groups and (2) the imposition on municipalities of a “Health in All Policies” (HiAP) approach where local policy-making </span><span class="fontstyle0">generally </span><span class="fontstyle0">is considered in light of public health impact. In addition, the act recommended municipalities employ a public health coordinator (PHC) and required a development of an overview of their citizens’ health to reveal underserved social segments. This study investigates the relationship between changes in municipal use of HiAP tools (PHC and health overviews) with regard to the PHA implementation and municipal prioritization of fair distribution of social and economic resources among social groups.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Data from two surveys, conducted in 2011 and 2014, were merged with official register data. All Norwegian municipalities were included (N = 428). Descriptive statistics as well as bi- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Thirty-eight percent of the municipalities reported they generally considered fair distribution among social groups in local policy-making, while 70% considered fair distribution in their local health promotion initiatives. Developing health overviews after the PHA’s implementation was positively associated with prioritizing fair distribution in political decision-making (odds ratio [OR] = 2.54; CI: 1.12-5.76), compared to municipalities that had not developed such overviews. However, the employment of PHCs after the implementation was negatively associated with prioritizing fair distribution in local health promotion initiatives (OR = 0.22; CI: 0.05-0.90), compared to municipalities without that position.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Development of health overviews </span><span class="fontstyle0">— </span><span class="fontstyle0">as requested by the PHA — may contribute to prioritization of fair distribution among social groups with regard to the social determinants of health at the local level.</span>
Equity,HIAP,Public Health Coordinator,Norway,Health Promotion
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3479.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3479_ce45b555991b9f9fc34e1665994e58b8.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
An Investigation of Prescription Indicators and Trends Among General Practitioners and Specialists From 2005 to 2015 in Kerman, Iran
818
827
EN
Ali
Masoud
Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies
in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
ali.masoudmj@gmail.com
Somayeh
Noori Hekmat
Research
Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman
University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
snhekmat@kmu.ac.ir
Reza
Dehnavieh
Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies
in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
rdehnavi@kmu.ac.ir
Naser
Haj-Akbari
Physiology Research Center,
Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
naserhajakbary@yahoo.com
Atousa
Poursheikhali
Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies
in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
atousa_prsh@yahoo.com
Zhaleh
Abdi
National Institute of
Health Research (NIHR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
zh-abdi@sina.tums.ac.ir
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.28
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to promote strategies that ensure efficacy, safety, suitability, and cost effectiveness of medicine prescription. Health systems should design effective mechanisms to monitor prescription and rational use of medicines at all healthcare settings. This study aimed to determine and analyze prescription patterns of general practitioners and specialists in Kerman/Iran from 2005 to 2015.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> This is an explanatory mixed method study. Data were gathered during two phases. At the first phase, prescriptions issued by physicians during 2005-2015 were reviewed to extract information required to develop eight main prescription indicators. In the second phase, the indicators trends were presented to experts participating in expert panel to have their opinions and analyses on the data obtained in the first phase. Experts were selected based on their experience and expertise in medicine and/or health policy and/or experience in implementation of polices to promote rational use of medicines. Some experts attending the panel were a sample of physicians whose prescriptions were included in the first phase.<br /> <br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Findings revealed that two indicators of the average price of prescriptions and the maximum number of medicines </span>in each prescription had an increasing trend over the study period. Reasons including unprecedented devaluation of the Iranian Rial and willingness of young physicians to prescribe more medications were proposed as the primary contributors to the observed increasing trends. However, other indicators including types of prescribed medicines, average number of medicines per prescription, the percentage of prescriptions with more than four medications, a percentage of encounters with a corticosteroid prescribed, a percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed, and a percentage of encounters with an injection prescribed decreased in the study period. Reasons of controlling initiatives adopted by the Ministry of Health, the higher responsibility of physicians, adoption of continued medical education (CME) programs, and improved knowledge of pharmacists, physicians, and patients about irrational use of medicines were proposed by participants as the main reasons for the decreasing trend.<br /> <br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Findings indicated that prescription indicators were better in Kerman than those of country average over the study period based on comparing the results of this study and others in Iran. However, they were non-desirable when compared to the international average. The number of factors contributes to the irrational use of medicines, including lack of knowledge among healthcare providers and patients, patients’ misunderstanding about the efficacy of some particular medicines, the high cost of drug development and manufacturing, and unavailability of effective medicines.</span> <br /><br />
Prescription Indicator,Trend,General Practitioner,Specialist,Iran
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3489.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3489_f076b1fb0ea4977d214f1f9a022373d3.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Inclusion of Health in Environmental Impact Assessment of Major Transport Infrastructure Projects in Vietnam
828
835
EN
Tracy
Pham
Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
tpha7097@uni.sydney.edu.au
Emily
Riley
Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical
School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
emily.riley@sydney.edu.au
Patrick
Harris
0000-0002-4649-4013
Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical
School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
patrick.harris@unsw.edu.au
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.36
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Infrastructure spending, especially in the transport sector, is expected to increase rapidly in Vietnam. This boost in transportation investment impacts health. Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are essential tools for decision-making to reduce and mitigate anticipated impacts of development projects, and integration of health assessment as an essential part of the EIA process has been regulated in many high-income countries. There is, however, limited knowledge about how health is evaluated in these environmental assessments in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Vietnam.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">We did an analysis of EIAs of four major transport projects in Vietnam, applying a six-step coding framework previously used to investigate EIAs in the Australian context.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">We found that health was inadequately considered in all four EIAs. There was no direct health assessment within the four EIAs due to the lack of formal requirements from either Government or the financing agency, the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Health issues were often identified as risks posed by the projects within the assessment of impacts on environmental conditions. A broader consideration of health was limited. When social outcomes of the projects were present in EIAs, they were often mentioned once without any detailed assessment or linking to health. There was no evidence linking health benefits and shifts towards active travel with the construction of two metro rail projects. Mitigation measures offered in all four EIAs were found to be generic and insubstantial.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">The health assessments in the EIAs of four transport projects in Vietnam were significantly less detailed than those in Australia, mainly due to the lack of legislative requirements. The lack of health content indicates the need for involvement of health experts in the environmental assessment process, as well as requirements for the health assessment to be integrated in EIA. Our findings suggest there is the need to build capacity both within and outside of government to fully consider the health impacts of infrastructure in EIA practice.</span> <br /><br />
Health,Transport,Vietnam,Environmental Assessment,Content Analysis
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3492.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3492_fdbbb8e736da8146f7ac5aef66b2f2e5.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Volunteering for Health Services in the Middle Part of Ghana: In Whose Interest?
836
846
EN
Samuel
Afari-Asiedu
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
samuel.afari-asiedu@kintampo-hrc.org
Kwaku Poku
Asante
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
kwakupoku.asante@kintampo-hrc.org
Kodjo
Senah
Department of Sociology, School of Social Science, University of Ghana,
Accra, Ghana
kodjosenah@yahoo.co.uk
Martha Ali
Abdulai
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
molmart2000@yahoo.com
Stephen
Afranie
Department of Sociology, School of Social Science, University of Ghana,
Accra, Ghana
afranie@ug.edu.gh
Emmanuel
Mahama
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
emmanuelmahama@gmail.com
Edward Apraku
Anane
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
ananeapraku80@gmail.com
Mahama
Abukari
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
mahamahdss@gmail.com
Martin Luther
Darko
Department of Sociology, School of Social Science, University of Ghana,
Accra, Ghana
dmartinluther123@yahoo.com
Lawrence G.
Febir
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana
lawrence.febir@kintampo-hrc.org
Seth
Owusu-Agyei
Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied
Sciences, Ho, Ghana
seth.owusu-agyei@kintampo-hrc.org
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.38
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">In many developing countries like Ghana, community volunteers assist in the provision of certain health services to rural and hard-to-reach communities. This study examined factors that influence the motivation and retention of community-based volunteers supporting with work on health-related activities at the community level in Ghana.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Using a sequential mixed-method design, a cross-sectional survey was carried out among 205 selected community-based volunteers in Kintampo North Municipality (KNM) and Kintampo South District (KSD) of Ghana between December, 2014 and February, 2015. Qualitative interviews, including 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) among health workers and community opinion leaders and 2 focus group discussion (FGD) sessions with volunteers were conducted.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Personal interest (32.7%) and community leaders’ selection of volunteers (30.2%) were key initial reasons for volunteering. Monetary incentives such as allowance for extra duty (88.8%) and per diem (49.3%) and non-monetary incentives such as T-shirts/bags (45.4 %), food during training (52.7%), community recognition, social prestige and preferential treatment at health facilities were the facilitators of volunteers’ retention. There was a weak evidence (</span><span class="fontstyle0">P </span><span class="fontstyle0">= .051) to suggest that per diem for their travels is a reason for volunteers’ satisfaction.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Community-based volunteers’ motivation and retention were influenced by their personal interest in the form of recognition by community members and health workers, community leaders’ selection and other nonmonetary incentives. Volunteers were motivated by extra-duty allowance but not per diems paid for accommodation and feeding when they travel. Organizations that engage community volunteers are encouraged to strengthen the selection of volunteers in collaboration with community leaders, and to provide both non-monetary and monetary incentives to motivate volunteers.</span>
Community Volunteers’ Motivation,Community Volunteers’ Retention,Community Volunteers’ Satisfaction,Monetary Incentives,Non-monetary Incentives
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3494.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3494_c5f361317900389140fc34b11905f87c.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Retaining Doctors in Rural Bangladesh: A Policy Analysis
847
858
EN
Taufique
Joarder
0000-0002-3299-2628
James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
taufiquejoarder@gmail.com
Lal B.
Rawal
HERD International,
Kathmandu, Nepal
dr.lalrawal@gmail.com
Syed Masud
Ahmed
Centre of Excellence for Health Systems and Universal
Health Coverage, James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University,
Dhaka, Bangladesh
ahmed.sm@bracu.ac.bd
Aftab
Uddin
International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research,
Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
aftabu61@gmail.com
Timothy G.
Evans
Health Nutrition and Population,
Human Development Network, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA
timgrant.evans@gmail.com
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.37
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Retaining doctors in rural areas is a challenge in Bangladesh. In this study, we analyzed three rural retention policies: career development programs, compulsory services, and schools outside major cities – in terms of context, contents, actors, and processes.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Series of group discussions between policy-makers and researchers prompted the selection of policy areas, which were analyzed using the policy triangle framework. We conducted document and literature reviews (1971-2013), key informant interviews (KIIs) with relevant policy elites (n = 11), and stakeholder analysis/position-mapping.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">In policy-1, we found, applicants with relevant expertise were not leveraged in recruitment, promotions were often late and contingent on post-graduation. Career tracks were porous and unplanned: people without necessary expertise or experience were deployed to high positions by lateral migration from unrelated career tracks or ministries, as opposed to vertical promotion. Promotions were often politically motivated. In policy-2, females were not ensured to stay with their spouse in rural areas, health bureaucrats working at district and sub-district levels relaxed their monitoring for personal gain or political pressure. Impractical rural posts were allegedly created to graft money from applicants in exchange for recruitment assurance. Compulsory service was often waived for political affiliates. In policy-3, we found an absence of clear policy documents obligating establishment of medical colleges in rural areas. These were established based on political consideration (public sector) or profit motives (private sector).<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Four cross-cutting themes were identified: lack of proper systems or policies, vested interest or corruption, undue political influence, and imbalanced power and position of some stakeholders. Based on findings, we recommend, in policy-1, applicants with relevant expertise to be recruited; recruitment should be quick, customized, and transparent; career tracks (General Health Service, Medical Teaching, Health Administration) must be clearly defined, distinct, and respected. In policy-2, facilities must be ensured prior to postings, female doctors should be prioritized to stay with the spouse, field bureaucrats should receive non-practising allowance in exchange of strict monitoring, and no political interference in compulsory service is assured. In policy-3, specific policy guidelines should be developed to establish rural medical colleges. Political commitment is a key to rural retention of doctors.</span>
Health Systems Research,Human Resources for Health,Rural Retention,Policy Analysis,Bangladesh
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3495.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3495_7a38b4509dc933afc456f4951df01dd8.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Malaria Knowledge and Treatment Practices in Enugu State, Nigeria: A Qualitative Study
859
866
EN
Benjamin Sunday C.
Uzochukwu
0000-0002-0794-0455
Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria,
Enugu Campus, Enugu State, Nigeria
bscuzochukwu@gmail.com
Edmund Ndudi
Ossai
0000-0002-4098-4898
Department of Community Medicine, College
of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria
ossai_2@yahoo.co.uk
Chinyere Cecilia
Okeke
0000-0002-2599-537X
Department
of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla,
Enugu State, Nigeria
chinyereokeke83@yahoo.com
Anne Chigedu
Ndu
Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria,
Enugu Campus, Enugu State, Nigeria
anne_ndu@yahoo.com
Obinna E.
Onwujekwe
Health Policy and Research Group
Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
onwujekwe@yahoo.co.uk
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.41
<span class="fontstyle0">Background</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Malaria accounts for 60% of outpatient visits in Nigeria. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of malaria and its treatment practices in Enugu state, Nigeria.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Methods</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Qualitative data was collected through the use of focus group discussions (FGDs), from six villages three each from urban and rural areas of Enugu state, Nigeria. A total of 18 FGDs involving 189 participants were conducted and data on place of treatment for malaria and drug of choice for malaria treatment were collected.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Results</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Most discussants had a good knowledge of the signs and symptoms of malaria. They reported late for treatment when they had symptoms suggestive of malaria. Treatment timing was affected by financial capability and perceived severity of disease. There was preference for patent medicine dealers (PMDs) and pharmacies for malaria treatment. The reasons included drug affordability, obtaining preferred drug, short waiting time and polite treatment from the providers. Treatment in most cases was without proper malaria diagnosis. Cost was an important factor in determining the drug of choice for malaria treatment. This could explain why people were not aware of the use of artemisininbased combination therapy while preferring mono-therapies and herbal drugs. Public hospitals were considered as good sources of treatment for malaria although they remain the last resort when treatment from these drug outlets failed.<br /></span><br /> <br /> <span class="fontstyle0">Conclusion</span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">The community members preferred PMDs and pharmacies for malaria treatment. Unfortunately, these drug outlets do not encourage the use of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). This makes it necessary that pharmacists and PMDs are trained on management of malaria. Also, improving the knowledge of the public on the need for malaria diagnosis before treatment and use of artemisinin-based combination therapy will improve the control of malaria. The populace should be instructed to seek treatment early while also discouraging the use of herbal drugs for malaria treatment. There is also the need to improve service delivery at public health facilities.</span>
Knowledge of Malaria,Treatment Practices,Qualitative Study,Enugu State,Nigeria
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3496.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3496_cd6db09f11cdff2ad2ca21b59fc34077.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Disturbing the Doxa of Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
867
869
EN
Joanne
Travaglia
0000-0002-7537-0466
Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
joanne.travaglia@uts.edu.au
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.26
<span class="fontstyle0">In a recent edition of this journal, Mannion and Braithwaite provide a succinct analysis of the emergence, and ultimately limited impact, of what they term the current ‘Safety I’ movement in healthcare. They describe the arc of this field from denial, through engagement via mechanisms and approaches imported from other industries, to the current situation where, despite ‘best efforts,’ error rates remain stubbornly recalcitrant.<br /></span><br /> <span class="fontstyle0">In examining the failure of system-wide efforts to produce sustained reductions in errors and adverse events, that article exposes the doxa, or what Bourdieu calls ‘the taken for granted’ which is central to this latest wave of patient safety movement. In this commentary, I would like to take focus on two key elements of Mannion and Braithwaite’s argument: that harm is caused by misguided but otherwise well-intentioned actions and the ‘embracing’ of patient safety. I then conclude by briefly considering the implications of these for Safety II, particularly as envisaged by the authors as an evolutionary, and therefore linear progression, from Safety I.</span>
Sociology of Safety,Sociology of Professions,Bourdieu
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3493.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3493_15f0fabba1ed74418149dc3ea31820fc.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Achieving Integrated Care for Older People: What Kind of Ship?; Comment on “Achieving Integrated Care for Older People: Shuffling the Deckchairs or Making the System Watertight for the Future?”
870
873
EN
Rod
Sheaff
0000-0002-7984-2627
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
r.sheaff@plymouth.ac.uk
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.44
<span class="fontstyle0">This paper considers an implication of the idea that proposals for integrated care for older people should start from a focus on the patient, consider co-production solutions to the problems of care fragmentation, and be at a system-wide, cross-organisational level. It follows that the analysis, design and therefore evaluation of integrated care projects should be based upon the journeys which older patients with multiple chronic conditions usually have to make from professional to professional and service to service. A systematic realistic review of recent research on integrated care projects identified a number of key mechanisms for care integration, including multidisciplinary care teams, care planning, suitable IT support and changes to organisational culture, besides other activities and contexts which assist care ‘integration.’ Those findings suggest that bringing the diverse services that older people with multiple chronic conditions need into a single organisation would remove many of the inter-organisational boundaries that impede care ‘integration’ and make it easier to address the interprofessional and inter-service boundaries.</span>
Integrated Care,Primary Care,Multi-morbidity,Chronic Illness,Organisational Integration,Systematic Review
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3498.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3498_64a0d7685fa6beac3b3d7cb56d4d219a.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Researching Healthy Public Policy: Navigating the ‘Black Box’ Means Thinking More About Power; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
874
876
EN
Patrick
Harris
0000-0002-4649-4013
University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
patrick.harris@unsw.edu.au
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.52
<span class="fontstyle0">Lawless et al provide a valuable narrative of using program logic to develop an evaluation of Health in All Policies (HiAP) in South Australia. In this commentary I argue that the paper and analysis is an extremely useful example of navigating the supposed black box of policy-making. However the original makes the reader work too hard and is distracting from the main narrative of explaining the logic behind the HiAP approach in South Australia. My response covers avoiding epistemological traps and weighing up the pragmatics of collaborative policy research with more complex institutional policy issues like power.</span>
Health,Public Policy,Logic Models,Power
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3504.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3504_d871da94ec062ad66e02e9eb8a645317.pdf
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
2322-5939
7
9
2018
09
01
Inpatient Out-of-Pocket in Iran After Health Transformation Plan
877
878
EN
Sulmaz
Ghahramani
0000-0002-4161-5146
Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
suli.ghahraman@gmail.com
Kamran
Bagheri Lankarani
Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
kblankarani@yahoo.com
10.15171/ijhpm.2018.34
Inpatient Out-of-Pocket in Iran After Health Transformation Plan
Health Transformation Plan,Iran,Out of Pocket,Hospital,Patient
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3487.html
https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3487_725512f36854a62b9d33412c4dd941fa.pdf